WT Forums

Novice here. What's the difference between an interceptor and a fighter? What qualities make for a good interceptor versus a good fighter? Why, for instance, do some consider the F-14 the best
interceptor but the F-15 the best fighter?

Thanks

I have a very good answer to your question Viper, but I am heading out the door to go shoot a quick nine. I will get back to you this evening when I have more time.

Interceptor TOP qualities = SPEED, RANGE, Longrange sensors and weapons. Maneuverability CAN be sacrificed for these things IF nessesary. Responds to a threat quickly and decisevly. An interceptor needs to be able to get out to a target quickly and deter the target from it's mission. Doesnt HAVE to kill the target but DOES have to make it change it's mind. F-111 would have been a good Interceptor, but a BAD fighter.

Fighter TOP qualities = Maneuverability, Leathality, Reliability too. Generaly responds to anticipated threats as in patroling an area and attacking anything that pops up. Establishes air superiority in an area and keeps it. F-16 great fighter, lousy interceptor.

Many aircraft straddle the two definitions , the F-14 is an interceptor that can fight because of it's VG wings. And the F-15 is a fighter that can intercept because of it's blinding speed and ability to carry a LARGE amount of external fuel.

"We sleep safely in our beds because rough men stand ready in the night to visit violence on those who would harm us". George Orwell

Fighting For Justice With Brains Of Steel !
<img src="http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/ac/atengun2X.GIF" border=0>

_________________
The only time you have too much fuel is when you're on fire.