Warthog Territory Forums
http://warthogterritory.net/forum/

Maintenance Realignments
http://warthogterritory.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=19&t=12394		 Page 1 of 1
Author:  TheLastRaven [ 12 Dec 2007, 23:42 ]
Post subject:  Maintenance Realignments
For those who have been bitching about MXGs and AMXSs for the past 5 1/2 years, there is hope!

Key maintenance, logistics functions realign

by Staff Sgt. Monique Randolph
Secretary of the Air Force Public Affairs

12/11/2007 - WASHINGTON (AFPN) -- The alignment of fighter and combat search and rescue aircraft maintenance units under flying squadrons was announced by the Air Force chief of the staff Dec. 7 here.

Between July and November 2008, AMUs supporting fighter and CSAR flying squadrons will realign within those squadrons, Gen. T. Michael Moseley said.

\"I believe the most effective formula is to structure Air Force units by mission and not by function, and aligning maintenance units responsible for sortie generation together with the flying squadrons they support is best for our Air Force,\" General Moseley said. \"Aircraft maintenance is a vital element of a flying squadron's mission, and the maintainers that directly support sortie generation belong in that chain of command.\"

Additionally, the new organizational construct will give flying squadron commanders at home station all the necessary resources and authority to execute their missions, while ensuring consistency with operations at deployed locations. Further, it will provide combatant commanders with the most complete and capable fighting squadrons possible, he said.

With this reorganization, the Air Force is given an opportunity to create a new process-aligned structure that will better support the logistics enterprise, flying wings and combatant commanders, General Moseley said.

Simultaneous with the fighter and CSAR maintenance units' realignment, maintenance groups across the Air Force will deactivate and materiel groups will stand up in their place. The materiel groups will include logistics readiness squadrons, aerial port squadrons and the remaining maintenance squadrons.

\"This alignment will consolidate traditional logistics functions under a single logistics leader in the wing and position the logistics community for future transformation initiatives,\" General Moseley said. \"It will also better prepare our maintenance and logistics officers for senior leadership positions.

\"The squadron is the building block of Air Force organizational structure, and they must be organized for success,\" the general said. \"These initiatives allow us to take advantage or process improvements, pool our resources and reorient our squadrons around our mission.\"

Air Force leaders are still examining organizational options for bomber, mobility, special operations and intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance platforms.
Over the next 18 months, Air Force officials will conduct analysis with major commands to determine the correct organizational solutions for the remaining platforms.


http://www.af.mil/news/story.asp?id=123078892

--Raven
Author:  Old Chief [ 13 Dec 2007, 00:18 ]
Post subject: 
Quote:
With this reorganization, the Air Force is given an opportunity to create a new process-aligned structure that will better support the logistics enterprise, flying wings and combatant commanders, General Moseley said.


Ummm, will someone please tell me wtf he said? Process-aligned structure? Logistics enterprise?

If I read the whole article correctly, the plan is to put the fox in charge of the chicken coop.

OC
Author:  fenderstrat72 [ 13 Dec 2007, 03:48 ]
Post subject: 
Back to the future, part II
Author:  Lil Hitler [ 13 Dec 2007, 04:28 ]
Post subject: 
can anyone say Deja-Fricking-vu'. What's next a return to TQM
Author:  jackb [ 13 Dec 2007, 05:03 ]
Post subject: 
So in plain english - goodbye AMU, hello again FS?
Author:  30mike-mike [ 13 Dec 2007, 13:26 ]
Post subject: 
Quote:
What's next a return to TQM

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Author:  fenderstrat72 [ 13 Dec 2007, 15:40 ]
Post subject: 
jackb wrote:
So in plain english - goodbye AMU, hello again FS?



You got it. AMXS and MXG are going bye-bye.
Author:  sgtgoose1 [ 24 Dec 2007, 16:07 ]
Post subject: 
I just saw this, trying to catch-up.

I never knew \"Why\" they did away with the AMU and FS\" concept.

You were together, like us The 76th AMU and the 76TH TFS. The Fixing was OUR job and the Flying was Their Job.
When we Deployed the TFS CO was the \"OVERALL COMMANDER with a AMU CO.\" We worked as 2-in 1 forming a \"Fighting Unit\".

The TFS CO didn't have to worry about a bunch of \"Crewdawgs\" and when we thought the Flying Schedule was \"BULLSHIT!\" we had Supervision to tell OP's that.

We answered to the AGS CO &the DCM,, and OP'S answered to the WING COand Staff.
Every one had their own chain of command and when Deployed we all fell under the TFS .

OMS, FMS and AMS, worked better then these \"BULLSHIT IDEAS TODAY\"

It ran Smooth, plus the more \"Command\" positions the more \"Promotions \" in the Officer ranks as a \"Commander.
So what do they do with Pilots who no longer can Fly? They made better DCM's then NON Flyer's really.

And when we went to the \"SANDBOX\" with BLUE we backed filled with Black section can you do that under a \"TFS\" system?

Now these new \"SAR AND CAS\" units working hand and hand with the Helo units I can kind of understand, but lets face it you get alot of BIAS when one is closer to one group then the other.

At Yokota we had T-39's, UH1-N's and C-130's , guess who got the Support? The C-130's due to the CO being a \"Herky Pilot\" .
TRAVIS the samething we had C-141 and FREDS who got the \"SUPPORT\" the FREDS why? The CO was a FRED pilot.

The only thing we had going was that the CINCPAF we supported his Air Operations and I was supported by AFCC

You might as well bring back TQM or as we said then
TIME (to) QUIT MAINTANCE or TIME (to) QUIT (the)MILITARY

I know someone will say \"You have change\" but all your doing as every time you get a New USAF Chief of STAFF they change it, like Uniforms .

Goose
Author:  Coach [ 30 Dec 2007, 19:05 ]
Post subject: 
I think its a great idea! One unit, one commander, one mission.

Coach
Author:  jackb [ 31 Dec 2007, 00:18 ]
Post subject: 
I agree entirely.
I am not sure of the right words to phrase it, but being in a separate squadron implies that we are not on the same team, which we are, becuase of our MISSION.

They would never put specs in one squadron and Crew chiefs in another and weapons in another (grouping us by function instead of mission) so why should all maintainers be separate from pilots?
Author:  sgtgoose1 [ 31 Dec 2007, 02:36 ]
Post subject: 
The AMU/ TFS system worked pretty well back in the \"Old Days\"

We always felt as \"One\" with Op's. We wore the same patches. The only thing was with the AMU concept you had the \"AMU fall into the AGS (Aircraft Generation Squadron) basically for paperwork. Then we had the back shops , EMS, CRS, AMS, DCM.
AMU's had Crew Chiefs, Specialist,Weapons, our own supply and Admin plus supervision . We could operate on our own,

We proved this during the \"Cornet Warrior (III)\" We did everything like a \"Mini Squadron\" with Op's. We were always on the \"Same team\" . If you think the AMU/TFS system would make you feel otherwise , talk to the \"Old Folks\".
Back then we use to on TDY's party with our Pilots and did alot with them as a \"Team\". TDY's were a \"Joint effort\" and \"PRETTY DAMN GREAT TOO!

Op's commander needs to really worry about his \"Pilots\" not \"Johnny Check Bouncer\" or a \"Problem with heating in the Dorm.The AMU and AGS took care of that.

The pilots Knew their \"DCC's and ACC's\" by their \"Real names\" but still we went by our \"Nicknames\", But we knew almost ever Pilots \"Quirks, their likes dislikes, where they liked they gear stowed, how fast they went thru the checklist,.
The pilots knew the CrewChiefs, and Their quirk's, how their Jet Flew, and coming out of Op's they had our pictures on the wall with our tail numbers so they knew us.

I re-enlist with my PILOT giving me the Oath (Jet was in Phase Dock) That was \"ICEMAN\" (Capt S.) my first A-10 pilot on 0166.

But we were a Team, You talked Bad about one of our Pilots, you were looking for a FIGHT, (well some CODE3 Charlies not as much :wink: )

Plus when the Pilot came out and you Saluted and he said \"Hows it going Goose?\" and You brief him on the Jet holding the binder some would go \"Just Stow them , I don't need to look at them\".
That was to me was the \"Greatest Sign of Respect you could give a CrewChief\" well it was to me.

Plus during the War, it showed that the \"Closeness\" we felt for our pilots was Real .

Even before the War if \"We had a Pilot, lose their life\" The AMU's members showed-up because it was a \"Loss of a Family member\". If one of ours died, Op's cared and showed it.

I know the USAF has changed, maybe for the better in some ways, but after being in , AMS,OMS,AGS,CAMS, DET'S with Sections, Base flights,
En routes, etc....
The AGS with the AMU/TFS was my favorite system of them all.

IMO

Goose
Page 1 of 1 All times are UTC [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/