WT Forums

Home | WT Forums | Hogpedia | Warthog blog | Hosted sites
It is currently 09 Apr 2025, 15:33

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 17 Feb 2004, 18:33 
Offline

Joined: 05 Aug 2002, 13:28
Posts: 2210
<i>Putin Watches As Missile Launch Fails

By VLADIMIR ISACHENKOV
The Associated Press
Tuesday, February 17, 2004; 2:45 PM


MOSCOW - A technical glitch thwarted the launch of Russian ballistic missiles in the Barents Sea on Tuesday during naval maneuvers overseen by President Vladimir Putin, who watched the massive exercise while decked out in naval officer's garb aboard a nuclear submarine.



The failed launch - part of an exercise described as the largest show of Russian military might in more than 20 years - marred an event apparently aimed at playing up Putin's image as a leader attempting to restore the country's military power and global clout.

Putin, who is expected to easily win the presidential election March 14, went to the Barents Sea on board the giant Arkhangelsk submarine to observe maneuvers set to involve numerous missile launches and flights of strategic bombers.

But the ambitious exercise hit a snag when a ballistic missile - a missile that is launched on a high-arch trajectory to hit a designated target - failed to blast off as scheduled from another submarine, the Novomoskovsk, a government official said on condition of anonymity. The official said the automatic safety system blocked the launch for unspecified reasons.

A Defense Ministry spokesman refused to comment. And Russian state-run television channels, which are lavishly covering the daily activities of Putin ahead of the election, did not report the failed launch.

But the event became a hot topic for Russian analysts and military figures.

"The failed launch has shown the gap between the real condition of the Russian military and the ambitions and muscle-flexing of the Russian leadership," said Yevgeny Volk, the head of the Heritage Foundation's Moscow office.

Retired Capt. Igor Kurdin, who in the early 1990s served as captain of the Novomoskovsk, said a technical problem or a crew mistake might have caused the failure.

"It's very annoying that it happened in front of the commander in chief," Kurdin, who did not witness the exercise, told The Associated Press. "I'm sure that the crew was getting ready for the launch very thoroughly in such circumstances."

There were differing accounts of what happened.

The Interfax and ITAR-Tass news agencies said the Novomoskovsk had been scheduled to launch two RSM-54 missiles in succession at a practice target on the Kamchatka Peninsula in Russia's Far East.

They quoted an unidentified Northern Fleet officer as saying a satellite signal blocked the missile launch from Novomoskovsk, a Delta IV-class submarine.

An online news outlet, gazeta.ru, said the missile suffered an engine failure and disintegrated immediately after its launch.

Despite earlier official statements about the scheduled launch, the Russian navy's chief, Adm. Vladimir Kuroyedov, was shown later on NTV television insisting the navy had planned only imitation "electronic" launches, both of which he said were performed successfully.

Putin boarded the Arkhangelsk late Monday, putting on naval officer's garb complete with white scarf and gloves. He inspected the ship, discussed the exercise's plan with the top brass and dined with the crew.

"Putin likes playing these military games and donning uniforms," Volk said in a telephone interview. "It was part of the election campaign, an attempt to win the military and nationalist votes."

Putin visited another Northern Fleet nuclear submarine in April 2000, just about four months before the sinking of the Kursk nuclear submarine in the Barents Sea. That catastrophe killed all 118 men on board and cut into the Russian navy's prestige.

After returning to the Arctic base, Putin traveled to the northern launch pad of Plesetsk. There, he was expected to watch the launch of a Topol intercontinental ballistic missile, the Kommersant newspaper reported Tuesday.

The exercises, which began in late January, reached their peak Tuesday when 13 Northern Fleet ships and seven nuclear submarines, including the Arkhangelsk, went out to sea, practicing launches of air defense missiles, according to Channel One television. Several Tu-95 strategic bombers also participated, test-firing cruise missiles.

The Russian military has dismissed media reports that the exercises closely resemble Soviet-era simulations of an all-out nuclear war with the United States, saying the maneuvers are not directed against any specific country.

At the same time, the military said the exercises reflect Moscow's concerns about U.S. plans to develop new types of nuclear weapons. It has not said when the exercises will end.

</i>


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 18 Feb 2004, 06:27 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: 17 Jun 2002, 10:29
Posts: 5935
Location: S of St Louis but in IL
<BLOCKQUOTE id=quote><font size=1 face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id=quote>quote:<hr height=1 noshade id=quote>A Defense Ministry spokesman refused to comment.<hr height=1 noshade id=quote></BLOCKQUOTE id=quote></font id=quote><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" size=2 id=quote> The STE (Siberian Telephone Exchange) was having technical difficulties. <img src=newicons/anim_lol.gif border=0 align=middle>

I am a nobody, and nobody is perfect, therefore, I am perfect.

_________________
\"Those who hammer their guns into plows
will plow for those who do not.\"
- Thomas Jefferson


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 18 Feb 2004, 08:32 
Offline
WT Game Warden
User avatar

Joined: 17 Oct 2002, 11:23
Posts: 2278
Location: Pennsylvania
"Putin visited another Northern Fleet nuclear submarine in April 2000, just about four months before the sinking of the Kursk nuclear submarine in the Barents Sea. That catastrophe killed all 118 men on board and cut into the Russian navy's prestige."

It's really a shame Russia didn't want any help from other countries or less people would have died aboard the Kursk. Pride comes before a fall...


"Your calling <b>me</b> a liar?"
<img src="http://www.landmarktheatres.com/Assets/Images/Films/36175.jpg" border=0>

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 18 Feb 2004, 09:05 
Offline

Joined: 08 May 2003, 09:23
Posts: 729
Haha...

Putin couldn't get it up!!! <img src=newicons/anim_lol.gif border=0 align=middle> <img src=newicons/anim_lol.gif border=0 align=middle>

Yes, you can all slap me now...

“Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote.” Benjamin Franklin, 1759


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 18 Feb 2004, 09:53 
Offline
WT Game Warden
User avatar

Joined: 17 Oct 2002, 11:23
Posts: 2278
Location: Pennsylvania
Maybe...is it against Snipe's unwritten laws to slap someone after they slander Russia, no matter how distastefully?

There's been a long legacy of Russia imitating America, poorly. Anyone else back my theory Putin was just trying to ride Bush's coat tails to increased popularity?

"Your calling <b>me</b> a liar?"
<img src="http://www.landmarktheatres.com/Assets/Images/Films/36175.jpg" border=0>

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 18 Feb 2004, 10:10 
Offline

Joined: 08 May 2003, 09:23
Posts: 729
Well if he invades Estonia or something we might jump on your bandwagon... <img src=newicons/saevil.gif border=0 align=middle>

“Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote.” Benjamin Franklin, 1759


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 18 Feb 2004, 10:22 
Offline
WT Game Warden
User avatar

Joined: 17 Oct 2002, 11:23
Posts: 2278
Location: Pennsylvania
Nice of you to say that. But doubtfull Russia could handle two breakaway republics at once.

Main reason Lithuania successfully broke from the USSR? Godless Commie Heathens took the heat off of them and commited solely to Chechnya.

"Your calling <b>me</b> a liar?"
<img src="http://www.landmarktheatres.com/Assets/Images/Films/36175.jpg" border=0>

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 18 Feb 2004, 12:24 
Offline
WT Game Warden
User avatar

Joined: 27 May 2003, 18:48
Posts: 2449
Location: Still fighting the indians in Western Massachusetts
I think Putin has a lot on his plate. While America is one of them I definetly dot think we are the biggest fish in a strategic sense. There is after all the long lasting Sino/Russian relations, North Korea, the afformentioned break away republics of the CIS and maybe most importantly, maybe its just pure economics. Many countries that were once Warsaw pact are now NATO members and buying US and Western European goods. A revitalized military industrial complex provides good money and a few years down the road more technology for the private sector. The only question I ask myself is, how can developing new nuclear, SLBM's provide for any of the above ? I like to be an optimist. As far as threatening the US goes though, I highly doubt he is trying to do that. Think about it, even though the Russians dont posses the nuclear might that they once did, they still posses enough to make us consider the Risk Theory that AT Mahan preached about before the Great Dreadnought Race. So event if MAD doesnt apply anymore, I think that The Risk Theory does and that is enough to keep the US from getting a little uptight over an SLBM test gone bad. But that is just my humble opinion.

By this time tomorrow I shall have gained either a pearage or Westminster Abbey........Nelson

_________________
YGBSM !


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group