WT Forums

Home | WT Forums | Hogpedia | Warthog blog | Hosted sites
It is currently 13 Apr 2025, 13:06

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 23 Mar 2004, 08:17 
WASHINGTON - The Clinton and Bush administrations' failure to pursue military action against al-Qaida operatives allowed the Sept. 11 terrorists to elude capture despite warning signs years before the attacks, a federal panel said Tuesday.

The Clinton administration had early indications of terrorist links to Osama bin Laden (news - web sites) and future Sept. 11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed as early as 1995, but let years pass as it pursued criminal indictments and diplomatic solutions to subduing them abroad, it found.

Bush officials, meanwhile, failed to act immediately on increasing intelligence chatter and urgent warnings in early 2001 by its counterterrorism adviser, Richard A. Clarke, to take out al-Qaida targets, according to preliminary findings by the commission reviewing the attacks.

"We found that the CIA (news - web sites) and the FBI (news - web sites) tended to be careful in discussing the attribution for terrorist attacks," the bipartisan report said. "The time lag between terrorist act and any definitive attribution grew to months, then years, as the evidence was compiled."


Former Rep. Lee Hamilton, appearing on CBS's "The Early Show" Tuesday, said, however, the commission will not make any final judgments about the Clarke allegations or other assertions until it has reviewed all the evidence.


"The commission will not make any judgments about that, nor will I," he said.


The preliminary report did say, though, that the U.S. government had determined bin Laden was a key terrorist financier as early as 1995, but that efforts to expel him from Sudan stalled after Clinton officials determined he couldn't be brought to the United States without an indictment. A year later, bin Laden left Sudan and set up his base in Afghanistan (news - web sites) without resistance.


In spring 1998, the commission found, the Saudi government successfully thwarted a bin Laden-backed effort to launch attacks on U.S. forces in that country. But even after the August 1998 embassy bombings in Africa, the administration declined covert military action in favor of Saudi assistance in persuading the Taliban to expel bin Laden. The Taliban refused, it said.


"From the spring of 1997 to September 2001, the U.S. government tried to persuade the Taliban to expel bin Laden to a country where he could face justice," the report said. "The efforts employed inducements, warnings and sanctions. All these efforts failed."


The report was part of the commission's two-day hearing focusing on the two administration's failed responses to the threat from al-Qaida.


Scheduled to testify Tuesday were Secretary of State Colin Powell (news - web sites) and Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld, as well as their counterparts in the Clinton administration, William Cohen and Madeleine Albright (news - web sites). They were appearing as part of the panel's review of failures in diplomatic and military strategy.


The hearing comes following explosive allegations in a book released Monday by Clarke, Bush's former counterterrorism coordinator and a holdover from the Clinton administration, who is expected to testify Wednesday.


He said that he warned Bush officials in a January 2001 memo about the growing al-Qaida threat after the Cole attack but was put off by national security adviser Condoleezza Rice (news - web sites), who "gave me the impression she had never heard the term (al-Qaida) before."


The commission's report Tuesday said Clarke pushed for immediate and secret military aid to the Taliban's foe, the Northern Alliance. But Rice and her deputy, Stephen Hadley, proposed a broader review of the al Qaida response that would take more time. The proposal wasn't approved for Bush's review until just weeks before Sept. 11.


The 10-member commission had invited Rice to testify, but she has declined on the advice of the White House, which cited separation of power concerns involving its staff appearing before a legislative body.


Other potential diplomatic failures cited by the commission:


_ The United States in 1995 located Mohammed in Qatar. He was then a suspect in a 1995 plot to plant bombs on American airliners in Asia. FBI and CIA officials worked on his capture, but first sought a legal indictment and then help from the Qatari government, who they feared might tip Mohammed off. In 1996, Qatari officials reported Mohammed had suddenly disappeared.





_ The U.S. government pressed two successive Pakistani governments from the mid 1990s to pressure the Taliban by threatening to cut off support. But "before 9-11, the United States could not find a mix of incentives or pressure that would persuade Pakistan to reconsider its fundamental relationship."

_ From 1999 through early 2001, the United States pressed the United Arab Emirates, the Taliban's only travel and financial outlets to the outside world, to break off ties, with little success.

Scheduled to testify Wednesday are CIA director George Tenet; Rice's predecessor, Clinton national security adviser Sandy Berger; and a new witness added Tuesday to fill Rice's slot, Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage. On that day, the panel will review intelligence and national policy coordination.


"US Snipers, Providing surgical strikes since 1776"


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 23 Mar 2004, 15:22 
Offline

Joined: 05 Oct 2002, 14:22
Posts: 5353
Location: Missouri
HEY!! It cant be Klintons fault he fired cruise missles into the Afdirtistan desert, a brave decisive cruise missle attack. Those camels and tents never knew what almost hit them. And I'm SURE osammy Bin whatso didnt take THAT personnaly, right?

"We sleep safely in our beds because rough men stand ready in the night to visit violence on those who would harm us". George Orwell

Fighting For Justice With Brains Of Steel !
<img src="http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/ac/atengun2X.GIF" border=0>

_________________
The only time you have too much fuel is when you're on fire.
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 23 Mar 2004, 21:05 
Yeah, nothing will piss off an enemy worse than trying to kill him in a totally half-assed fashion.

"You don't even have the respect to try hard? Pffft...."

"US Snipers, Providing surgical strikes since 1776"


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 24 Mar 2004, 02:38 
Offline

Joined: 04 Dec 2003, 04:44
Posts: 186
i bet bin bag laden was well happy for uncle sam sending a goddamn missile at him

Yeah Right!

Im Not Claiming To Be Something I Am

But In The End....Who Cares?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 24 Mar 2004, 06:57 
Offline
Hog Crewdog

Joined: 06 Oct 2002, 19:55
Posts: 695
Location: Las Vegas
They bitch about this now, and start throwing blame around, but when we did take action everyone threw a hissy fit. WTF do they want us to do? Can't satisfy anyone these days.

--Raven

"'When it comes to my turn, will you want me to go?' 'For democracy, any man would give his only begotten son.'"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 24 Mar 2004, 07:05 
Offline

Joined: 04 Dec 2003, 04:44
Posts: 186
hmmm i reckon we should just stay out of their way

Im Not Claiming To Be Something I Am

But In The End....Who Cares?


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group