WT Forums

Home | WT Forums | Hogpedia | Warthog blog | Hosted sites
It is currently 13 Apr 2025, 13:11

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 39 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 30 Mar 2004, 15:05 
Offline
Warthog VFW
User avatar

Joined: 27 Jan 2002, 14:02
Posts: 6162
Location: IL
I'VE BEEN HEARING AND WATCHING WHAT I CAN ON THE 9/11 COMMISON.

AND AFTER ALL THIS CRAP ON RICE NOT GOING IN FRONT OF THE COMMISSION,TODAY THEY CHANGE THEIR MIND.

CLARKE IS SELLING A BOOK,BUT I REALLY WONDER IF HE AINT RIGHT ABOUT SOMETHINGS.
WHY WOULD YOU BASICALLY "SHOOT YOURSELF" BY ATTACKING THE WHITEHOUSE ON 9/11 UNLESS YOU REALLY BELIEVE YOUR RIGHT?
THE WAY THE WHITE HOUSE HAS BEEN ATTACKING HIM,IT SEEMS THAT THEIR HIDDING SOMETHING MORE THAN HIM.

EVERYONE SCREWED UP,BUT DID IRAQ REALLY HELP IN THE ATTACK?
I'M GLAD THE SOB'S GONE,WE SHOULD OF DONE IT 11 YRS AGO!
ITS JUST REALLY CONFUSSING.

ITS ALL POLITICAL BUT I REALLY DONT THINK IF THE TRUTH COMES OUT IT WONT CHANGE THE ELECTION

PRESS TO TEST

_________________
\"Live Free Or Die\"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 30 Mar 2004, 16:36 
Offline

Joined: 05 Oct 2002, 14:22
Posts: 5353
Location: Missouri
I HAVENT been following any of this (just to be clear) but I dont care wheather Iraq was involved or not I just wanted him outta there too.

Far more important to me is the monumental intel screw-up on all the WMD. If they wern't there (the WMD), then WHAT was the intel telling them about that? Who knew what and when?

"We sleep safely in our beds because rough men stand ready in the night to visit violence on those who would harm us". George Orwell

Fighting For Justice With Brains Of Steel !
<img src="http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/ac/atengun2X.GIF" border=0>

_________________
The only time you have too much fuel is when you're on fire.
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 30 Mar 2004, 23:11 
Iraq was about revenge and settling unfinished business.

I got no problems with that.

If Clinton hadn't fucked around for so many years none of us would even know the names Al Qaeda and Bin Laden.

This happened 10 months after Bush took office, and NOTHING like 9-11 had ever happened before...not anywhere.

I blame 19 muslim terrorists for 9-11, and a bunch of scumbags named Al Qaeda.

They all must die.

"US Snipers, Providing surgical strikes since 1776"


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 31 Mar 2004, 08:00 
Offline
Warthog VFW
User avatar

Joined: 27 Jan 2002, 14:02
Posts: 6162
Location: IL
WE KNEW ABOUT BIN LADEN BEFORE CLINTON,WE SUPPLIED THOSE GUYS WITH ARMS TO FIGHT IVAN IN AFGANLAND.

THE BIG QUESTION THAT REALLY IN MY MIND NEEDS TO BE

"WAS ALQAEDA AS HIGH ON THE LIST OF THREATS AS THE WHITE HOUSE HAS CLAIMED?
" WHO REALLY SCREWED UP READING THE INTEL ON BOTH AL-QAEDA AND IRAQ?"

IT LOOKS LIKE A JOINT EFFORT ON THE SNAFU ON THE INTEL BUT EVEN CHENEY AND RICE DISAGREE ON IF CLARKE WAS IN A MEETING OR NOT. ON HOW IMPORTANT HE WAS,ETC... AND THE PRES. AND VICE PRES ONLY WILL TESTIFY BEHIND CLOSE DOORS TOGETHER,CLINTON AND GORE IN PUBLIC BY THEIRSELFS.

I'M GLAD SADDUMBASS IS REMOVED, AND ITS TRUE MOST PEOPLE WHO SUPPORTED THE WAR CAN CARE LESS ABOUT WMD'S, THE POINT IS GETTING TO NOW THE $$$$$$$$$$$$$$ AND HOW AND THE HELL DO WE GET OUT?
THESE YAHOO'S AINT GOING TO EVER CHANGE,ALL THEY WANT ARE THE HAND OUTS AND A COUPLE OF CONTRACTORS LIKE THE MONEY.

THE ONLY THING I THINK WOULD OF BEEN PREVENTED ON 9-11 WAS THE ATTACK ON THE PENTAGON IF THE SAM'S WOULD OF BEEN PUT IN PLACE.
THEN THE WHOLE IDEA OF SHOTING DOWN A CIVILIAN JET TO SAVE THE CAPITAL AT THE LOST OF UNTOLD NUMBERS FROM THE FALLING DEBRIS AROUND D.C.

ITS PRETTY WELL SCREWED UP ANYWAY YOU LOOK AT IT. AND IF THESE 19 WERE STOPPED,THEN ANOTHER GROUP ETC...... WOULD OF TRIED.

PRESS TO TEST

_________________
\"Live Free Or Die\"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 31 Mar 2004, 09:03 
Offline

Joined: 10 Mar 2003, 14:49
Posts: 426
<BLOCKQUOTE id=quote><font size=1 face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id=quote>quote:<hr height=1 noshade id=quote>
WE KNEW ABOUT BIN LADEN BEFORE CLINTON,WE SUPPLIED THOSE GUYS WITH ARMS TO FIGHT IVAN IN AFGANLAND.

THE BIG QUESTION THAT REALLY IN MY MIND NEEDS TO BE

"WAS ALQAEDA AS HIGH ON THE LIST OF THREATS AS THE WHITE HOUSE HAS CLAIMED?
" WHO REALLY SCREWED UP READING THE INTEL ON BOTH AL-QAEDA AND IRAQ?"

<hr height=1 noshade id=quote></BLOCKQUOTE id=quote></font id=quote><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" size=2 id=quote>
-----------

911 happened on Bush's watch. Lots of unaswered questions so far. AG Ashcroft was flying around in a pricey G-3 bizjet because of threats a few months before 911. What were the threats?

What the hell happened to NORAD on 911? How many fighters did we have in the air on 911 for training flights?

Italians took the threat of a hijacked airliner being used as a missile at the G-8 meeting in Italy, that Bush attended, they had a CAP up, and serious SAMs on the ground in July of 2001.

How the hell did the Bin Laden family and other Saudis get out of the US without being interviewed on Sept 12, 01 or so. When every damn civilian aircraft was grounded?

There were more than a few reports of using hijacked airliners for a 911 attack for years.

What we need to know, what did the Administration know and when did they know it? We also need to know why we had such a piss poor response to 4 hijacked airliners at one time.

Clarke and Tenet were warning all of some serious attacks upcoming before 911.

We still can't find UBL. 50 million buck reward now.

Jack


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 31 Mar 2004, 09:35 
The Admin's knew who bin laden was...don't tell me that in the days of Afghanistan any of us knew. Please.

What would you have done differently if you had no specific intel of what kind of attack???

We couldn't just fly a nationwide CAP before 9-11. The money wasn't there, and the support wasn't there.

You guys seem to forget just how poorly maintained the F-15 fleet was after years of languishing under Clinton. We had to cannibalize almost half the fleet because there weren't even spare parts for them being bought under the Clinton admin.

Hindsight is 20/20...and you guys are falling for a LOT of hype. Tell me what you'd have done differently that would have been politically acceptable on 9-10-2001. OF COURSE there were all kinds of failures or it wouldn't have happened. But the failures started way back in Afdirtistan, and continued unabated for over a decade.

Bin Laden should've had his clock cleaned after the Cole.


"US Snipers, Providing surgical strikes since 1776"


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 31 Mar 2004, 09:54 
Offline

Joined: 06 Nov 2002, 15:06
Posts: 54
Word on the street is that Clarke was the one who in fact helped the Saudis with sensitive names get out of the US after the attacks...

Whatever...Point is that the threat was ignored for about 8 years after attack after attack. Who's to blame? The terrorists, that's who. Wipe 'em out. I agree with Snipe that the Cole should have caused action to take Bin Laden out (either in overt or covert action)...At that time I compared the Cole with the attack on the gunboat Panay by the Japanese in 1937, and kept talking about a major attack soon.

"The more you sweat in peacetime, the less you bleed in war."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 31 Mar 2004, 10:07 
Clinton wanted to arrest Bin Laden. He had the FBI running all over the world trying to slap cuffs on the guy. He aint a criminal...he's a terrorist, and a terrorist on foriegn soil. There's only one way to deal with those.

After the Cole it should've been ass kicking time in a major way.



"US Snipers, Providing surgical strikes since 1776"


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 31 Mar 2004, 10:12 
Offline
Hog Crewdog

Joined: 06 Oct 2002, 19:55
Posts: 695
Location: Las Vegas
I think trying to find someone at fault is a waste of time and money that WE are paying for. Yeah, a lot of people dropped the ball in some aspect...it's done, we know who was directly responsible, why are we trying to blame our own people instead of maintaining a unified front against these scum bags? Just like life, we need to move forward and learn from our mistakes.

And, with all of the finger pointing, why is no one recalling Clinton Administration officials and interrogating them over the 5 terrorist attacks against Americans during his terms? USS Cole? Kobar Towers? WTC?

This whole thing just pisses me off...<img src=newicons/madani.gif border=0 align=middle>

--Raven

"'When it comes to my turn, will you want me to go?' 'For democracy, any man would give his only begotten son.'"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 31 Mar 2004, 15:32 
Offline

Joined: 10 Mar 2003, 14:49
Posts: 426
[quote]
Word on the street is that Clarke was the one who in fact helped the Saudis with sensitive names get out of the US after the attacks...

--------

Clarke is on record as the crisis manager. He was given the request to release the Saudis by either State or Andy Cards the COS. He also had the FBI vet the passenger list.

Regarding the Cole. It was attacked in October 2000. They weren't real sure who was behind it till late December or early January.

The 93 WTC bombing is more than interesting. The FBI had an informant in the terrorist cell and the stupid shits let the damn bombing proceed anyway.

As for the NORAD response, give me a break, they were on Payne Stewarts bizjet pretty damn quick. They had something like 130 odd intercepts in the months before 911.

This commission was given about 20 million taxbucks for the investigation. Whitewater was over 70 million. The Columbian shuttle investigation was pushing 500 million bucks.

A good way to starve an investigation is to keep the bucks down.

I smell your basic whitewash and it's lost in history.

Jack


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 31 Mar 2004, 17:37 
Offline
Warthog VFW
User avatar

Joined: 27 Jan 2002, 14:02
Posts: 6162
Location: IL
THE CIA NEW BIN LADEN IN THE 80'S,BUT BACK THEN HE WAS FIGHTING THE RUSSIANS,AND THAT WAS COOL WITH US.JUST LIKE SADDAM FIGHTING IRAN.

EVERYONE IS AT FAULT,YOUR RIGHT RAVEN FINGER POINTING IS USLESS.
I DIDNT START THIS THREAD TO GET IN A "BUSH VS CLINTON" WAR.
THE ONLY THING I COULD SAY FOR SURE ABOUT WHAT I WOULD DONE DIFFERENT WOULD OF BEEN "KILLING B-BOY",YOU CANT TREAT THESE PEOPLE AS POW'S, SCREW ARRESTING HIM.
THE SAME FOR SADDAM, MILITARY COURT AND SHOT THE NEXT DAY!.

BUT THE COLE ATTACK.
LETS SEE NOW,MIDDLE OF A PRES. CHAMPAIGN,IF CLINTON WOULD OF ORDERED A ATTACK,THE REPUBLICIANS WOULD OF SAID IT WAS "POLITICAL".
AND IF DOLE WOULD OF WON IN 96 JUST REVERSE THE PARTIES.

THE BIGGEST THING THAT GETS ME IS,EVERYONE HAS A DIFFERENT VIEW ON WHAT HAPPENED AND REALLY THE WHITE HOUSE'S RESPONSE WAS PRETTY"AGGRESSIVE"FOR SOMETHING THAT WAS FALSE IN THEIR MIND.

I USE THE OLD 50/50 RULE ON THIS CLARKE IS SELLING A BOOK,AND THE WHITE HOUSE IS TRYING TO TIE UP THE LOOSE ENDS ON WHAT HAPPENED BEFORE 9-11.

SNIPE YOUR RIGHT,SPENDING MONEY FOR DEFENSE WOULD OF PISSED OFF PEOPLE WHO WERE SPENDING THE "PEACE DIVIDEN" BUT BOTH SIDES WHERE DOING THAT.

IT'LL BE REALLY INTERESTING TO SEE THE NEXT FEW WEEKS.

THE ONE THING I FEEL WE'RE ALL IN AGREEMENT IS "THE MILITARY IS TOO DAMN SMALL" AND UNDER FUNDED.

PRESS TO TEST

_________________
\"Live Free Or Die\"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 31 Mar 2004, 18:50 
Offline
WT Game Warden
User avatar

Joined: 27 May 2003, 18:48
Posts: 2449
Location: Still fighting the indians in Western Massachusetts
I agree with Goose. There are to many twists and turns especially in the high tech world of modern spooks to ever know the real truth. Having said that, when they put a hole in one of our boats, it should have been high time to kick butt.

By this time tomorrow I shall have gained either a pearage or Westminster Abbey........Nelson

_________________
YGBSM !


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 31 Mar 2004, 23:33 
Offline
Hog Crewdog

Joined: 06 Oct 2002, 19:55
Posts: 695
Location: Las Vegas
Right on. There are way too many twists to ever find out what went on leading up to. I am still pissed off about Richard Clarke's book, though. It has obvious liberal favoritism, and it was slated for a late April release...but now with the 9/11 commission and the presidential race heating up early, it got released mid-March...how odd. He still claims it was released late due to White House tie-ups...two faced bastard.

--Raven

"'When it comes to my turn, will you want me to go?' 'For democracy, any man would give his only begotten son.'"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 01 Apr 2004, 01:02 
It all stinks, start to finish this whole mess.

But know what?

We're knee deep in the shit now. Time to suck it up and drive on, not whine like a bunch of soccer moms.

"US Snipers, Providing surgical strikes since 1776"


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 01 Apr 2004, 16:54 
Offline

Joined: 05 Aug 2002, 13:28
Posts: 2210
Well, when I saw that Clarke's first venue was CBS, I knew it was not worth any of my time.

Here's what my favorite blond bimbo heart breaker conservative had to say:

<i>How 9-11 Happened
March 31, 2004



We don't need a "commission" to find out how 9-11 happened. The truth is in the timeline:

PRESIDENT CARTER, DEMOCRAT

In 1979, President Jimmy Carter allowed the Shah of Iran to be deposed by a mob of Islamic fanatics. A few months later, Muslims stormed the U.S. Embassy in Iran and took American Embassy staff hostage.

Carter retaliated by canceling Iranian visas. He eventually ordered a disastrous and humiliating rescue attempt, crashing helicopters in the desert.

PRESIDENT REAGAN, REPUBLICAN

The day of Reagan's inauguration, the hostages were released.

In 1982, the U.S. Embassy in Beirut was bombed by Muslim extremists.

President Reagan sent U.S. Marines to Beirut.

In 1983, the U.S. Marine barracks in Beirut were blown up by Muslim extremists.

Reagan said the U.S. would not surrender, but Democrats threw a hissy fit, introducing a resolution demanding that our troops be withdrawn. Reagan caved in to Democrat caterwauling in an election year and withdrew our troops – bombing Syrian-controlled areas on the way out. Democrats complained about that, too.

In 1985, an Italian cruise ship, the Achille Lauro, was seized and a 69-year-old American was shot and thrown overboard by Muslim extremists.

Reagan ordered a heart-stopping mission to capture the hijackers after "the allies" promised them safe passage. In a daring operation, American fighter pilots captured the hijackers and turned them over to the Italians – who then released them to safe harbor in Iraq.

On April 5, 1986, a West Berlin discotheque frequented by U.S. servicemen was bombed by Muslim extremists from the Libyan Embassy in East Berlin, killing an American.

Ten days later, Reagan bombed Libya, despite our dear ally France refusing the use of their airspace. Americans bombed Gadhafi's residence, killing his daughter, and dropped a bomb on the French Embassy "by mistake."

Reagan also stoked a long, bloody war between heinous regimes in Iran and Iraq. All this was while winning a final victory over Soviet totalitarianism.

PRESIDENT BUSH I, MODERATE REPUBLICAN

In December 1988, a passenger jet, Pan Am Flight 103, was bombed over Lockerbie, Scotland, by Muslim extremists.

President-elect George Bush claimed he would continue Reagan's policy of retaliating against terrorism, but did not. Without Reagan to gin her up, even Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher went wobbly, saying there would be no revenge for the bombing.

In 1990, Saddam Hussein invaded Kuwait.

In early 1991, Bush went to war with Iraq. A majority of Democrats opposed the war, and later complained that Bush didn't "finish off the job" with Saddam.

PRESIDENT BILL CLINTON, DEMOCRAT

In February 1993, the World Trade Center was bombed by Muslim fanatics, killing five people and injuring hundreds.

Clinton, advised by Dick Clarke, did nothing.

In October 1993, 18 American troops were killed in a savage firefight in Somalia. The body of one American was dragged through the streets of Mogadishu as the Somalian hordes cheered.

Clinton responded by calling off the hunt for Mohammed Farrah Aidid and ordering our troops home. Osama bin Laden later told ABC News: "The youth ... realized more than before that the American soldier was a paper tiger and after a few blows ran in defeat."

In November 1995, five Americans were killed and 30 wounded by a car bomb in Saudi Arabia set by Muslim extremists.

Clinton, advised by Dick Clarke, did nothing.

In June 1996, a U.S. Air Force housing complex in Saudi Arabia was bombed by Muslim extremists.

Clinton, advised by Dick Clarke, did nothing.

Months later, Saddam attacked the Kurdish-controlled city of Erbil.

Clinton, advised by Dick Clarke, lobbed some bombs into Iraq hundreds of miles from Saddam's forces.

In November 1997, Iraq refused to allow U.N. weapons inspections to do their jobs and threatened to shoot down a U.S. U-2 spy plane.

Clinton, advised by Dick Clarke, did nothing.

In February 1998, Clinton threatened to bomb Iraq, but called it off when the United Nations said no.

On Aug. 7, 1998, U.S. embassies in Kenya and Tanzania were bombed by Muslim extremists.

Clinton, advised by Dick Clarke, did nothing.

On Aug. 20, Monica Lewinsky appeared for the second time to testify before the grand jury.

Clinton responded by bombing Afghanistan and Sudan, severely damaging a camel and an aspirin factory.

On Dec. 16, the House of Representatives prepared to impeach Clinton the next day.

Clinton retaliated by ordering major air strikes against Iraq, described by the New York Times as "by far the largest military action in Iraq since the end of the Gulf War in 1991."

The only time Clinton decided to go to war with anyone in the vicinity of Muslim fanatics was in 1999 – when Clinton attacked Serbians who were fighting Islamic fanatics.

In October 2000, our warship, the USS Cole, was attacked by Muslim extremists.

Clinton, advised by Dick Clarke, did nothing.

PRESIDENT GEORGE BUSH, REPUBLICAN

Bush came into office telling his national security adviser, Condoleezza Rice, he was "tired of swatting flies" – he wanted to eliminate al-Qaida.

On Sept. 11, 2001, when Bush had been in office for barely seven months, 3,000 Americans were murdered in a savage terrorist attack on U.S. soil by Muslim extremists.

Since then, Bush has won two wars against countries that harbored Muslim fanatics, captured Saddam Hussein, immobilized Osama bin Laden, destroyed al-Qaida's base, and begun to create the only functioning democracy in the Middle East other than Israel. Democrats opposed it all – except their phony support for war with Afghanistan, which they immediately complained about and said would be a Vietnam quagmire. And now they claim to be outraged that in the months before 9-11, Bush did not do everything Democrats opposed doing after 9-11.

What a surprise.
</i>


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 01 Apr 2004, 17:22 
Great post...but Israel is not a democracy.

"It should come as a surprise only to the fools among the men of our generation that we liked war."

Major V. 'Popski' Poniakov, British LRG, WWII


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 01 Apr 2004, 17:56 
Offline

Joined: 05 Aug 2002, 13:28
Posts: 2210
What is it then?
It's modeled after the British Parliament.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 01 Apr 2004, 19:01 
Offline
WT Game Warden
User avatar

Joined: 17 Jun 2002, 09:37
Posts: 1630
Location: Warner Robins, Ga
<BLOCKQUOTE id=quote><font size=1 face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id=quote>quote:<hr height=1 noshade id=quote>
THE ONE THING I FEEL WE'RE ALL IN AGREEMENT IS "THE MILITARY IS TOO DAMN SMALL" AND UNDER FUNDED.
<hr height=1 noshade id=quote></BLOCKQUOTE id=quote></font id=quote><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" size=2 id=quote>

couldn't have said it better myself...

<img src="http://img23.photobucket.com/albums/v70/prkiii/70th.jpg" border=0><img src="http://img23.photobucket.com/albums/v70/prkiii/Mav_shot.jpg" border=0><img src="http://img23.photobucket.com/albums/v70/prkiii/25.jpg" border=0>

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 01 Apr 2004, 19:43 
Offline
Warthog VFW
User avatar

Joined: 27 Jan 2002, 14:02
Posts: 6162
Location: IL
TRIT,
YOU FORGET CLARKE WAS WORKING FOR BUSH TOO, PLUS WE DIDNT KNOW WHO HAD ATTACKED THE COLE UNTIL LATER ON.

PLUS I WOULD REALLY SAY THAT THE WAR IN IRAQ AND AFGANLAND IS STILL GOING ON.
IS THE WORLD A BETTER PLACE,ITS UP FOR GRABS.
SADDAM CAPTURED !!!!!!!!!!! GREAT MAKES ME HAPPY

BIN LADEN -------------------- WE SHOULD HAD HIM AT LEAST 5 YEARS AGO
GORE NOT ELECTED <img src=icon_smile_big.gif border=0 align=middle>
THE WAY THE MILITARY PERFORMED IN 2003 <img src=icon_smile_big.gif border=0 align=middle><img src=icon_smile_big.gif border=0 align=middle><img src=icon_smile_big.gif border=0 align=middle>
THE WAY THEY HAVE BEEN PERFORMING SINCE 2003 IN THE FACE OF THESE <img src=newicons/anim_cussing.gif border=0 align=middle><img src=newicons/anim_cussing.gif border=0 align=middle><img src=newicons/anim_cussing.gif border=0 align=middle> YAHOO'S <img src=icon_smile_big.gif border=0 align=middle><img src=icon_smile_big.gif border=0 align=middle>

BUT I'M NOT GOING TO GIVE BUSH THE WARM FUZZY YET ON WHAT HAPPENED BEFORE 9/11 OR DISMISS CLARKES STATMENTS YET UNTIL I SEE RICE AND THE REST APPEAR BEFORE THE COMISSION.
IF YOU AINT GOT NOTHING TO HIDE THEN LET IT ALL OUT IN THE OPEN.

AND I'M STILL PISSED THAT ITS A BUSH ,KERRY RACE IN THE FALL.
I CANT IN GOOD FAITH RIGHT NOW PICK EITHER ONE.
AND THAT PICKET FENCE IS REALLY STARTING TO HURT MY ASS.


PRESS TO TEST

_________________
\"Live Free Or Die\"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 01 Apr 2004, 20:55 
Offline

Joined: 05 Aug 2002, 13:28
Posts: 2210
<i>TRIT,
YOU FORGET CLARKE WAS WORKING FOR BUSH TOO, PLUS WE DIDNT KNOW WHO HAD ATTACKED THE COLE UNTIL LATER ON.</i>

Yes, I know. However, on 60 minutes, he pounded this administration but said nothing of the Clinton failures; it made me wonder.

Bush would've got destroyed by his opponents if he took premature action against Al-Quaeda. Nowadays, Public officials are too afraid to take drastic measures because of dissenting opinion.
In this country, you're damned if you do and damned if you don't; it's exactly like dealing with the Arabs, no happy medium.
Plus, I think I remember learning early that in October '01 that they found that Bin Laden was behind the <i>Cole</i> bombing.

I was <b>not</b> shocked at what I saw when someone told me to turn on the TV that Tuesday morning in September. This was their original intention in Feb '93. Red tape, fear of political opponents responses, political correctness, and lack of communication between our two intelligence bureaus lead to this disaster.

So Goose, you don't know who to vote for?
I'll give you my two cents: The Clinton administration caused such a rift between the CIA and the FBI that neither wanted to communicate with each other and share intelligence.

What does that mean today?
Well, people that have been real close to Kerry have said the more you know him, the more you dislike him: He's stuck up and arrogant.

Now, do you want someone with a tempermant like that in the highest office, who will possibly send a rift like the Clinton admin (<i>arguably the worst president of the 20th century next to Johnson</i>) did and make the depts possibly not get along with each other? Plus, I don't like anyone swooning over the frauds at the U.N. security council, my two cents.


<i>BUT I'M NOT GOING TO GIVE BUSH THE WARM FUZZY YET ON WHAT HAPPENED BEFORE 9/11 OR DISMISS CLARKES STATMENTS YET UNTIL I SEE RICE AND THE REST APPEAR BEFORE THE COMISSION.
IF YOU AINT GOT NOTHING TO HIDE THEN LET IT ALL OUT IN THE OPEN.</i>

If you think you're going to get full enlightment on what happened in Dr. Rice's testimony, then you're gonna wait alooong time. She'll say nothing different than the 4 hours that she gave in the closed-door testimonial to the commision.

BTW guess who was today's Maxim Girlfriend of the Day:
http://www.maximonline.com/girlfriend_of_day/index.html


This comission has become a politicised, self-fladulating, waist of money and time; it's a farse. At least in the Clinton impeachment he actually lied.

In addition, we waited until WW II was over to start a Pearl Harbor commision. Don't we have better things to do, like bringing death and destruction on our enemies, ie. the French? <img src=icon_smile.gif border=0 align=middle>








Edited by - tritonal on Apr 01 2004 10:49 PM


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 02 Apr 2004, 00:35 
Offline

Joined: 05 Oct 2002, 14:22
Posts: 5353
Location: Missouri
I think Dick Clarke should go back to American Bandstand.

"We sleep safely in our beds because rough men stand ready in the night to visit violence on those who would harm us". George Orwell

Fighting For Justice With Brains Of Steel !
<img src="http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/ac/atengun2X.GIF" border=0>

_________________
The only time you have too much fuel is when you're on fire.
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 02 Apr 2004, 00:41 
I just hope that 51% of the registered voters in this country are smart enough to see through all the bullshit.

We got guys burned and dragged over there yesterday.

What does the US Army under Bush pledge?

"An overwhelming response."

When it happened in Somalia, what did Clinton do?

Oh....

PS- don't forget that it was Clinton and Co. that denied the Rangers tank and air support to begin with.

Israel is not a democracy, it's a socailist state.

"It should come as a surprise only to the fools among the men of our generation that we liked war."

Major V. 'Popski' Poniakov, British LRG, WWII


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 02 Apr 2004, 05:09 
Offline

Joined: 05 Oct 2002, 14:59
Posts: 2779
Um Snipe? What's with the Israel comment? I'm confused...

"Retreat, hell! We just got here!"-Captain Lloyd Williams, 2nd Marine Division, Belleau Wood, France, WWI


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 02 Apr 2004, 10:32 
It's not a democracy. Just stating fact.

Neither is most of Europe either.

"It should come as a surprise only to the fools among the men of our generation that we liked war."

Major V. 'Popski' Poniakov, British LRG, WWII


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 02 Apr 2004, 14:50 
Offline

Joined: 05 Aug 2002, 13:28
Posts: 2210
Hey Br, what math level did you finish with in High School?

It's part of the socialism question.
I find that the socialist democracy countries all blow us away in one institution: public education. It's really sad on our part.



Edited by - tritonal on Apr 02 2004 1:52 PM


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 39 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group