I saw mention of the Battelle gun gas deflector on another thread and wonder if I can get clarification on why there was such a push to get this thing to work. Is there anyone who worked flight test or data analysis of this problem in the late 70's early 80's? Here's my recollection from the engineering bias point of view:
After the fireball difficulty was fixed with a modified propellant, it was reported that the engines were losing performance because gun gas residue was sticking to the tubomachinery in the engines. Washing these engines was taking up too much maintenence time. I thought it was related to the propellant change, but maybe not? A relativly large effort was launched to fix this gun gas residue problem involving the gun maker (GE, Burlington), airframer (Fairchild), and an outside consultant (Battelle Labs). As an aside, I think GE,Lynn was tasked to help out with engine wash ideas. Fairchild proposed something they had tested in the prototype days we called the "double baffle" deflector. You may have seen pictures of a boilerplate steel flight test version of it installed on a prototype. It was pretty effective at deflecting the gas under the aircraft but it had aerodynamic and weight issues. We didn't want to do it. GE proposed a nice fix that was essentially a bevel at the barrel exit. Maybe they tried several bevel angles? It was partially effective, I think, but changed gun accuracy because the gas deflection induced a sideload on the barrel that set up unpleasant vibrations. Maybe it also changed the bullet trajectory as it exited the barrel. I don't remember many details of this mods performance. We didn't want to do it either but at least it was tolerable. Now about the "Battelle Device". It was the worst performing choice from the beginning. I never understood how it was supposed to function, with its massive spiral shaped muzzle clamp made of Inconel(?). Anyway, this thing must have tuned the gun natural frequencies to an airframe mode or something because the round dispersion went way up. Battelle used the argumment that it was not a bad thing since a larger dispersion meant a higer likelyhood of getting one round on target (huh!). Vibrations were so bad at the low firing rate that it was eliminated. Gun mount loads were horrendous. I think I recall that the gun rate was affected by airspeed because the thing acted like a pinwheel in the airstream, spinning the barrels faster. This thing was universally hated by stress and dynamics because it gave us tremendous problems, and armament could not understand why we were pushing a mod that made the gun less accurate and couldn't use the low rate. And yet this device became the baseline fix and was installed on many jets. We thought Battelle must have friends in high places to keep this project alive. After years in the making, this device just disappeared and we went back to bare barrels. Anybody insiders out there know what happened from another point of view?
Mc/I + P/A
_________________ ????
|