prkiii wrote:
Lets not go down this road, I've been both active duty and reserves, both are important, both have their good and bad. leave it at that please.
I've also been AD and now ANG. Folks just need to understand they are different (part time ANG and AFR) compared to full time (AD) two or three shifts with enough manning to do a two week phase.
I'm just trying to get the message out there that the government is actually trying to save jobs...and the A-10 in the ANG. I only quoted what
EVERY article about saving ANG jobs and aircraft state.
From the first link I posted.
Quote:
3rd District Congressman Marlin Stutzman led the fight saying the 122nd Fighter Wing operates at just 28 cents on the dollar when compared to an active duty base and it just makes sense if lawmakers are serious about tackling the national debt.
From the second link from the NGAUS (National Guard Association of the United States).
Quote:
In doing so, Senate defense leaders have joined the House of Representatives and the nation’s governors in rejecting the Air Force’s plan to cut its most economically efficient component in these challenging fiscal times.
I would think as small as the A-10 community is, we'd all be happy to see A-10s operational no matter who's they are rather than seeing 50-some A-10s heading to the boneyard. Also from a purely ANG standpoint, over 5,000 ANG full time and part time jobs are at stake.