WT Forums

Home | WT Forums | Hogpedia | Warthog blog | Hosted sites
It is currently 02 Apr 2025, 07:01

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: 18 Jun 2013, 16:37 
Offline
WT Admin
User avatar

Joined: 16 May 2004, 12:44
Posts: 1517
Location: DMAFB, AZ
Career field: Crew Chief
Don't get me started on the politics of "sequestration", and how it is not actually even cuts, just a decrease of the rate of future increases...

http://www.airforcemag.com/DRArchive/Pages/2013/June%202013/June%2018%202013/A-10,-B-1-Vertical-Cuts-On-the-Table.aspx
Quote:
A-10, B-1 Vertical Cuts On the Table
The Air Force may have to eliminate an entire fleet of a particular kind of aircraft—possibly all A-10s or B-1Bs—in order to live within reduced budgets if sequestration persists into Fiscal 2014 and beyond, Chief of Staff Gen. Mark Welsh said June 17. “It’s cheaper to cut fleets than it is to cut a few from a fleet: a lot cheaper,” Welsh said at an AFA-sponsored Air Force breakfast event in Arlington, Va. “So, it’s a way to recapitalize and modernize,” he added. Although Welsh cautioned that “we’re looking at everything” and “there is no coming together on a final decision…yet,” he told reporters that the logic underlying the last big round of aircraft divestitures still holds. The A-10, he said, is a “single mission airplane” and, pressed for cash, the Air Force must hold onto “multi-mission” aircraft—read F-16—as its first priority. Service officials have noted that retiring all A-10s would solve two financial problems. One is the expense and complexity of maintaining and operating two very different variants within the A-10 fleet: those with and without new wings, and with or without upgraded systems. The retirement also would allow avoidance of the cost of rewinging most A-10s. Welsh said the decisions on what to retire will be made “in partnership with Congress, the National Guard Bureau, with the Air Force Reserve….Right now, we are not limiting options at all.” Last week he said USAF may have to retire as many as 700 more aircraft.
—John A. Tirpak
6/18/2013


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 19 Jun 2013, 01:03 
Offline

Joined: 18 Jun 2013, 06:02
Posts: 5
This has been in work for months now at DM everyone is just blind to it in my opinion. With the hand over of a training sq to the Reserves(57th or 58th when ever they make up their mind) and the engine drops from recently retired jets. It's just a matter of time that Active Duty looses the hog. The Reservist are on track to take over all aspects of A-10's and make DM a one stop shop for reserve Birds. This hand over of a squadron was brought up a few months back at a wing cc and the answer we got was the Reservist work from a different pot of money blaaa blaa blaa :lol: Its unfortunate because the few Reservist i have worked with i would trade for most 3 Levels. If they cut a whole fleet from AD it will give more justification to Congress to continue to deplete our already dismal workforce. I hope i'm completely wrong and just looking at the glass half empty.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 19 Jun 2013, 07:54 
Offline

Joined: 09 Oct 2002, 06:49
Posts: 1454
I just don't see this ending well for the A-10. The AF wants the F-35 so what better way to make it a must have airframe than to get rid of it's competition... :ugeek:


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group