I have known that the History Channel is good at using footage of aircraft other than what they are talking about, but this video really starts to discredit them. They have obviously not only used non-incident video, but graphically doctored the video to make the non-thinking watcher think they are seeing video of the actual incident. Case in point:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e1aKxAN7 ... ed&search=
1st of all--anybody out there ever hear of F-15s having tailhooks? I gave them the benefit of the doubt on that one, as I figured the Israeli's could have installed them post-production and I haven't heard of it.
But then they show a video of the plane landing from behind, with one wing gone, but no tailhook.
2nd- the video shots of the plane flying, taken from below, show a very clean cut where the wing should be. Then the still pictures show mangled metal(which is more likely anyway)
3rd- Would the wing bleed off fuel for a period long enough to still be bleeding as it was getting close to the ground? I would think that whatever fuel that would bleed off from that damage would happen very rapidly then stop.
All this is making me start to wonder if that really is even the pilot talking? Or just some actor they gave a Hollywood crash-course on F-15 \"flying\"?
Yes, I know the History channel is hollywood, but I guess I always gave them a little more credit for being more documentary-oriented than dramatics. Hmmmmmmmmmmmmm........
