WT Forums

Home | WT Forums | Hogpedia | Warthog blog | Hosted sites
It is currently 19 Apr 2025, 11:44

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 20 May 2006, 11:05 
Retirement of B-52, U-2 and F-117a Halted
Posted on: May. 20th, 2006 || www.govexec.com

The House has voted to halt retirement of dozens of aircraft, which would have saved $2.6 billion by 2011. The Air Force planned to retire the older aircraft and use the money to upgrade other planes and buy new ones.
But retiring the B-52 bomber, U-2 spy plane and F-117 stealth fighter could leave the service with major holes in its fleet.

Although the unmanned RQ-4 Global Hawk has taken over many duties from the manned U-2 spy plane, any of the 34 U-2's will not be retired until the DoD can certify to Congress that the manned planes are no longer needed for intelligence-gathering and surveillance missions.
Retiring the U-2 could save $1 billion over the next four years.

The Air Force recently detailed plans to accelerate retirement of the F-117 stealth fighter, which would have saved $1 billion by 2011. The House rejected that plan, and allows the Air Force to retire only 10 Nighthawks in fiscal 2007. Furthermore, the House want all retired aircraft to be preserved for possible future operations.

The B-52 bomber has also been spared, none of the 94 B-52 H-model planes can retire until a replacement is available. The Pentagon earlier this year revealed its intent to reduce the fleet from 94 to 56 -- a move that would have saved $680 million through 2011, a congressional aide said.

House lawmakers also limited the retirement of KC-135E aerial refueling tankers to 29; the Pentagon wanted to sideline 78 of them, but did not provide Congress with details of those savings.

The Air Force has not yet submitted documents to the House Armed Services Committee detailing the ultimate cost of the delayed retirements, the aide said. An Air Force spokeswoman would not comment on the legislation.

<img src="http://i22.photobucket.com/albums/b343/m21sniper/OnTheJobEnhanced.jpg" border=0>
<b>"One post, One Kill".</b>


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 20 May 2006, 11:51 
Offline
WT Game Warden
User avatar

Joined: 25 Nov 2002, 21:15
Posts: 2000
<BLOCKQUOTE id=quote><font size=1 face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id=quote>quote:<hr height=1 noshade id=quote>But retiring the B-52 bomber, U-2 spy plane and F-117 stealth fighter could leave the service with major holes in its fleet.
<hr height=1 noshade id=quote></BLOCKQUOTE id=quote></font id=quote><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" size=2 id=quote>

Don't fool yourself, congress is not worried about "holes" in the fleet. They are worried about "holes" in their reelection funds. Pressure is coming from somewhere and it sure isn't because someone is worried about the USAF's capabilities. It is because they are worried about politics.

Fender

"Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it."
George Bernard Shaw


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 21 May 2006, 09:30 
Of course....but regardless, it looks like they stay.

<img src="http://i22.photobucket.com/albums/b343/m21sniper/OnTheJobEnhanced.jpg" border=0>
<b>"One post, One Kill".</b>


Top
  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group