Warthog Territory Forums http://warthogterritory.net/forum/ |
|
Chinese Air Force http://warthogterritory.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=3161 |
Page 1 of 1 |
Author: | troung [ 15 May 2003, 15:26 ] |
Post subject: | |
PLAAF Air Superiority Fighters 60 Su-30MKK 140 Su-27SK/UBK Multi Role Fighters 10 J-10 Air Defense Fighters 400 J-8B/C/H 800 J-7A/C/D/E/G (MiG-21F) Bombers 120 H-6A/E/H (Tu-16) 80 H-5 (Il-28) Close Air Support 560 A-5A/C/D/E (MiG-19 based) Naval Strike Fighters 28 Su-30MK2 Naval Air Defense 40 J-8D 100 J-7E Naval Bombers 12 H-6D Naval Strike 18 JH-7 100 A-5 Tanker 4 Il-78 12 H-6 tanker ELINT 2 Tu-154MD 12 HD-5 (Il-28) Maritime Patrol 10 Y-8 6 SH-5 Transports 14 Il-76 50 Y-8 (An-12) 22 Y-7 (An-24) 12 Y-14 (An-26) 300 Y-5 (An-2) Helicopters 150 Mi-17 12 Mi-8 24 S-70C 40 Z-9 (Panther) 3 Mi-6 Liaison Helicopters 40 Alouette III Naval Helicopters 10 Ka-28 23 Z-8 (Super Frelon) 20 Z-9 (Panther) AAM R-77 (AA-12) R-27ER/ET (AA-10C/D) R-27R/T (AA-10A/B) PL-10 R-73(AA-11) PL-9 (Python 3) PL-8 (Python 3) PL-5E PL-5B/C ASM Kh-59ME Kh-31A/P Kh-29T C-802 C-601 Plans additonal Su-30MKK more J-10 (~200-250) more Su-27SK (~60-80) 2-4 A-50 Kh-59MK more Il-76 more Il-78 SD-10 Edited by - troung on May 15 2003 2:33 PM |
Author: | M21 Sniper [ 15 May 2003, 15:41 ] |
Post subject: | |
TARGET PRACTICE ![]() "If they mean to have a war, let it begin here." Captain John Parker, Battle of Lexington. |
Author: | Stinger [ 15 May 2003, 16:23 ] |
Post subject: | |
<BLOCKQUOTE id=quote><font size=1 face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id=quote>quote:<hr height=1 noshade id=quote> TARGET PRACTICE ![]() "If they mean to have a war, let it begin here." Captain John Parker, Battle of Lexington. <hr height=1 noshade id=quote></BLOCKQUOTE id=quote></font id=quote><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" size=2 id=quote> Pajama Wearing Target Practice. <img src=icon_smile_big.gif border=0 align=middle> 1. Don't look conspicuous; it draws fire. 2. Never draw fire; it irritates everyone around you. |
Author: | troung [ 16 May 2003, 13:19 ] |
Post subject: | |
Yes it could be target pracitce. But I would rather fly a Su-30MKK then a F/A-18F. |
Author: | boomer [ 16 May 2003, 18:31 ] |
Post subject: | |
Since the Super Hornet carries AMRAAM and AIM-9X, I'll ride that pony thanks. "We sleep safely in our beds because rough men stand ready in the night to visit violence on those who would harm us". George Orwell Fighting For Justice With Brains Of Steel ! <img src="http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/ac/atengun2X.GIF" border=0> |
Author: | troung [ 16 May 2003, 22:09 ] |
Post subject: | |
Well the Su-30MKK carries the R-77 (AA-12) and R-73 (AA-11) so I think I'll pick it. I like that range, payload, and agilty. I do think the USA would kick Chinas ass, just not the F/A-18E/F. |
Author: | boomer [ 17 May 2003, 02:14 ] |
Post subject: | |
agility wont do much against 9X, and AMRAAM out fights AMRAAMSKI, so unless it's down to ramming tactics, I'll still stick with Hornet, super or otherwise. "We sleep safely in our beds because rough men stand ready in the night to visit violence on those who would harm us". George Orwell Fighting For Justice With Brains Of Steel ! <img src="http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/ac/atengun2X.GIF" border=0> |
Author: | chadrewsky [ 17 May 2003, 11:12 ] |
Post subject: | |
Its all about situational awareness.......Untill we lose that edge, its our fight to chose. The Chinese, and India seem to be departing somewhat from the old Soviet ground control radar doctrine, but the aircraft designs they are using were built with that concept in mind, and untill they depart from that completely, NATO, and Western air forces will have the drop. So when it comes down to it, the fight won't merge unless we allow it to. And when you factor such advantages as stealth, EW jamming, and AWACs, not to mention AEGIS and our extensive pilot training alone, the aircraft capability's itself are almost secondary, when the proper tatics are used. If your not having fun, your not doing it right! Edited by - chadrewsky on May 17 2003 10:15 AM |
Author: | boomer [ 17 May 2003, 16:22 ] |
Post subject: | |
hey chad I dont know much about ship fitts, do USN surface ships have some sort of barrage or other forms of aircraft jamming systems or is that left to airborn assets? I know they have deployable decoys. "We sleep safely in our beds because rough men stand ready in the night to visit violence on those who would harm us". George Orwell Fighting For Justice With Brains Of Steel ! <img src="http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/ac/atengun2X.GIF" border=0> |
Author: | troung [ 18 May 2003, 21:02 ] |
Post subject: | |
Well the PLAAF is lacking in power projection ability. The only planes which can try and project power are the Su-27SK, Su-30MKK, Su-30MKK-2 and possibly a handful of H-6D/I with the J-10 soon going to be part of that list. The rest of the planes are not ready for a fight in modern warfare with the J-7s and J-8s lakcing modern radars/BVR and having poor range. The rest of the H-6 bombers should not even be thought of as a threat seeing as they can only drop dumb bombs. The J-6s and H-5s are in a state of resevre and would be complety worthless. |
Author: | bigross86 [ 21 May 2003, 03:56 ] |
Post subject: | |
Does anybody know how powerful the jammers are on fighters like the F-15/-16/-18? How far out from the target would the jamming work until radar burned through? Have there ever been plans of integrating special jammer birds, such as B-52's or EA-6's? Or maybe modified fighters carrying just jammers and one or two AMRAAMs for self-defense? "Retreat, hell! We just got here!"-Captain Lloyd Williams, 2nd Marine Division, Belleau Wood, France, WWI |
Author: | boomer [ 21 May 2003, 15:03 ] |
Post subject: | |
ranges are ALL classified, probobly somewhat weather dependant and constantly changing with each software mod to the jammer. The B-52 HAS been proposed as a heavy jammer because of all the equipment it could carry, but it looks like they will go to an "all sevice" version of the F/A-18G Growler, like they have done with the EA-6B Prowler, sending them wherever they are needed wheather it's AF or Navy duty that week. "We sleep safely in our beds because rough men stand ready in the night to visit violence on those who would harm us". George Orwell Fighting For Justice With Brains Of Steel ! <img src="http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/ac/atengun2X.GIF" border=0> |
Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |