WT Forums

Home | WT Forums | Hogpedia | Warthog blog | Hosted sites
It is currently 07 May 2026, 08:10

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 15 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: New Static at Shaw AFB
PostPosted: 07 Nov 2008, 05:17 
Offline
WT Game Warden
User avatar

Joined: 25 Nov 2002, 21:15
Posts: 2000
Didn't have time to check it out but they are setting up an A-10 static at the front gate park. Don't shoot me if I am wrong but it looked like the tail# was 964. Yea I know, it is somewhere else. Well I can tell you that the F-16 across from the MPF has the incorrect tail# on it. I will check it out and let you guys know. Maybe get a pic or two.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 07 Nov 2008, 20:27 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: 13 Jul 2005, 16:19
Posts: 229
Location: Berlin, Germany
Give us the photo proof!

_________________
Joachim Jacob
Warthog News Editor
http://warthognews.blogspot.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 08 Nov 2008, 15:56 
Offline
WT Game Warden
User avatar

Joined: 27 May 2002, 13:12
Posts: 5068
Location: Hill AFB UT
Fender, looking forward to any info you can provide on this new gate-guard.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 13 Nov 2008, 05:39 
Offline
WT Game Warden
User avatar

Joined: 25 Nov 2002, 21:15
Posts: 2000
Been busy as heck lately. Going on base tomorrow with camera in hand.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 18 Nov 2008, 12:04 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: 27 Dec 2003, 01:54
Posts: 27
Location: Stationed Seoul Korea
fenderstrat72 wrote:
Didn't have time to check it out but they are setting up an A-10 static at the front gate park. Don't shoot me if I am wrong but it looked like the tail# was 964. Yea I know, it is somewhere else. Well I can tell you that the F-16 across from the MPF has the incorrect tail# on it. I will check it out and let you guys know. Maybe get a pic or two.


It's not uncommon they repaint a static with the non-authentic tail number. When a base gets a plane sometimes the historical events of that MDS at that base or of a particular tail number that was there takes precedence over the importance of authenticity of the aircraft SN.

There are numerous instances of this with my F-106's. I never liked it, but what can you do?
Image

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 25 Nov 2008, 05:10 
Offline
WT Game Warden
User avatar

Joined: 25 Nov 2002, 21:15
Posts: 2000
Here you go. Took these today.

Image

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 25 Nov 2008, 15:16 
Offline
WT Game Warden
User avatar

Joined: 27 May 2002, 13:12
Posts: 5068
Location: Hill AFB UT
It's not the right tail number for sure. 81-0964 was/is the only flying A-10 with an air-to-air kill, from my website....

\"The second air-to-air kill was archived by Capt Todd \"Shanghai\" Sheehy in aircraft 81-0964 while flying with the 511th TFS \"vultures\" out of Myrtle Beach SC.\"

It's stationed with the 23rd at Moody AFB Ga. I'll contact a friend of mine at the SPO and find out what the real number for this aircraft is. 964 was stationed at Shaw during the 90's and I'm sure that's why they used this tail number and not the real one.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 25 Nov 2008, 15:45 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: 18 Apr 2005, 12:39
Posts: 1690
Location: Netherlands
I thought that Vultures in those days are based at Bentwaters UK.

The pictures are looking good, fenderstrat72

_________________
73-1664


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 25 Nov 2008, 17:12 
Offline
WT Game Warden
User avatar

Joined: 25 Nov 2002, 21:15
Posts: 2000
Dice-man wrote:
It's not the right tail number for sure. 81-0964 was/is the only flying A-10 with an air-to-air kill, from my website....

"The second air-to-air kill was archived by Capt Todd "Shanghai" Sheehy in aircraft 81-0964 while flying with the 511th TFS "vultures" out of Myrtle Beach SC."

It's stationed with the 23rd at Moody AFB Ga. I'll contact a friend of mine at the SPO and find out what the real number for this aircraft is. 964 was stationed at Shaw during the 90's and I'm sure that's why they used this tail number and not the real one.


Dice, I actually worked on 964 in the 90's here at Shaw. I got here in 92 and never left. Wonder I didn't commit suicide being here that long. LOL


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 25 Nov 2008, 17:27 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: 16 Dec 2002, 07:30
Posts: 430
Location: Not far from Biggin Hill
Dutchy, the 'Vultures' were based at Bentwaters up till mid 88, then moved over to Alconbury along with the 509th.
When the 10th TFW at Alconbury closed for business in 92, the Hogs were returned stateside, the 'newer' Hog's mostly ended up at Shaw.
The 511th, who had been using some FY76/77 jets since about 1990 sent theirs to AMARC, except 77-259 which 'flys' in the American Air Museum at Duxford.
It can be seen in my doctored avatar.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 25 Nov 2008, 17:53 
Offline
Hog Driver

Joined: 27 Oct 2002, 00:46
Posts: 952
Location: NAS Norfolk VA
964 was the 74FS commander's flagship when it was at Pope. It was also one of the demo jets for a couple of years.

The 55FS was an F-111 squadron at RAF Upper Heyford before moving to Shaw. That was when the 20 TFW was at Heyford.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 26 Nov 2008, 04:53 
Offline
WT Game Warden
User avatar

Joined: 25 Nov 2002, 21:15
Posts: 2000
Coach wrote:
The 55FS was an F-111 squadron at RAF Upper Heyford before moving to Shaw. That was when the 20 TFW was at Heyford.


That's right. We were the 363rd TFW and the A-10's were in the 21st FS. Then we changed to the 20th and the 55th. A lot of guys came from Heyford with orders saying PCS from 20th TFW to 20th TFW, lol.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 26 Nov 2008, 16:24 
Offline
WT Game Warden
User avatar

Joined: 27 May 2002, 13:12
Posts: 5068
Location: Hill AFB UT
Coach wrote:
964 was the 74FS commander's flagship when it was at Pope. It was also one of the demo jets for a couple of years.


Yea it stopped by Hill back when I was still in uniform and I got a couple of pics of it in it's demo colors.

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 26 Nov 2008, 17:11 
Offline

Joined: 07 Jul 2003, 07:16
Posts: 72
Could it be 75-0309 that is preserved at Shaw.

_________________
shuck


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 27 Nov 2008, 03:29 
Offline
WT Game Warden
User avatar

Joined: 03 Jan 2007, 22:04
Posts: 141
Location: Hill AFB Utah
shuck wrote:
Could it be 75-0309 that is preserved at Shaw.


It could be.....it is a non-laste jet. I know 309 used to be one of the gate guards at Pope.

_________________
Gravity's not just a good idea.......its the LAW!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 15 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 29 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group