| Warthog Territory Forums https://warthogterritory.net/forum/ |
|
| Official DESERT STORM Scorecard https://warthogterritory.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=8221 |
Page 1 of 2 |
| Author: | majormadmax [ 19 Jan 2005, 06:49 ] |
| Post subject: | |
OK, I am calling someone out on a comment made on a different forum, and I need some support here. Someone made the following comment concering the F-111... <BLOCKQUOTE id=quote><font size=1 face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id=quote>quote:<hr height=1 noshade id=quote>I wouldn't call the F-111 a mistake...it destroyed more armour/vehicles/tanks in Desert Storm #1 than all the A-10's...<hr height=1 noshade id=quote></BLOCKQUOTE id=quote></font id=quote><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" size=2 id=quote> When I was at AGOS at Sembach back in the mid-90s there was an O-6 there who claimed BUFFS did more CAS than A-10s in DESERT STORM. He was quickly called out as well, and I think this guy is spouting BS as well. Anyone know where I can get the "official" stats? Cheers! M2 |
|
| Author: | jbpig [ 19 Jan 2005, 06:53 ] |
| Post subject: | |
I cant remember where the actual numbers are, however I clearly rember at a commanders call after DS-I when we returned, it was stated theat we (the hogs) flew 33% of all USAF missions, and destroyed X amount of all tanks/vehicles etc. I cant seem to find the hard numbers for ya but it did happen. HTH JB Utinam logica falsa tuam philosophiam totam suffodiant! |
|
| Author: | jbpig [ 19 Jan 2005, 07:01 ] |
| Post subject: | |
found this at http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/ ... istory.htm hope this is what you are looking for, JB Desert Storm A-10 Mission Results Targets Confirmed Destroyed Tanks 987 Artillery 926 APCs 501 Trucks 1,106 Command Vehicles 249 Military Structures 112 Radars 96 Helicopters (Air to Air) 2 Bunkers 72 Scud Missiles 51 Anti-Aircraft Artillery 50 Command Post 28 Frog Missiles 11 SAMs 9 Fuel Tanks 8 Fighters (Air to Ground) 10 Utinam logica falsa tuam philosophiam totam suffodiant! |
|
| Author: | jackb [ 19 Jan 2005, 07:06 ] |
| Post subject: | |
Even thogu the guy is wrong he's stil half right: I wouldn't call the 111 a mistake either. That is one badass jet. There are 10 kinds of people in the world: Those who understand Binary, and those who don't. |
|
| Author: | majormadmax [ 19 Jan 2005, 07:59 ] |
| Post subject: | |
JackB Concur. Despite the way it was developed, the F-111 was a great jet, for the most part. I worked EF-111s at Mountain Home (390 ECS) back in the mid-80s. However, all that said, I doubt the Varks did more tank killing than the beloved Hawg! Cheers! M2 |
|
| Author: | 30mike-mike [ 19 Jan 2005, 08:58 ] |
| Post subject: | |
Yeah, but 'Vark-farts are a sight to see!<img src=icon_smile_wink.gif border=0 align=middle><img src=icon_smile_cool.gif border=0 align=middle><img src=newicons/anim_lol.gif border=0 align=middle> So, you have trouble. We all have trouble. Build a bridge and get over it. |
|
| Author: | mattlott [ 19 Jan 2005, 10:30 ] |
| Post subject: | |
I still love the two air to air kills by the hog. Did the lawn darts get anything in the air. |
|
| Author: | M&M [ 19 Jan 2005, 11:05 ] |
| Post subject: | |
Did the lawn darts get anything in the air? No..... "face it....perhaps your only purpose in life is to serve as a warning to others!" |
|
| Author: | 30mike-mike [ 19 Jan 2005, 12:35 ] |
| Post subject: | |
...just lonely! So, you have trouble. We all have trouble. Build a bridge and get over it. |
|
| Author: | Hawg166 [ 19 Jan 2005, 20:42 ] |
| Post subject: | |
Hey dont forget my jet.............oops sorry Goose, I mean our jet 80-166 got one of those air to ground kills. A Mig-23 in a hangar I believe. Goose ifin you are out there I have the total for 166 but not handy. You can fill us in. By this time tomorrow I shall have gained either a pearage or Westminster Abbey........Nelson |
|
| Author: | Dice-man [ 20 Jan 2005, 17:41 ] |
| Post subject: | |
I know the F-111 did a lot of "tank pinking" during DS but don't know what the numbers were compared to the hawg?? I do work in the A-10 SPO (which used to be the A-10/F-111 SPO) and I'm sure I can find out. I have to be down-town (World Wide Review) all day tomorrow but I can looking into it Monday. Ugly But Well Hung |
|
| Author: | sgtgoose1 [ 20 Jan 2005, 21:41 ] |
| Post subject: | |
YEP,OLD GIRL 0166 GOT A MIG 21 FEB 16 1991 HIDDING IN A GARAGE ALONG A ROAD IN WESTERN IRAQ WHILE DOING SCUD HUNTING IN THE LATER DAYS. PILOT WAS CAPT VAIL. HE WAS PISSED THAT 0166 WASNT A VTR BIRD BACK THEN GOT IT WITH CBU'S. 0166 HAD BY MY RECORDS 27 TANKS BY WARS END ALONG WITH 3 FROGS,3 RADAR SITES/SAMS SITES 30+ TRUCKS 16 APC'S 18 AAA SITES. I NEVER SAW THE ACTUAL CONFIRM TOTAL AFTER THE WAR BUT THE TANKS AND THE MIG 21 I WROTE ON MY LATER DOOR ON FEB 26TH THE NIGHT BEFORE I WENT HOME. BUT THE NUMBERS ARE WHAT I HAD WROTE DOWN ON MY HAT FLAP. MONEY TALKS,B.S. JUST PILES UP. Edited by - sgtgoose1 on Jan 20 2005 8:47 PM |
|
| Author: | mattlott [ 21 Jan 2005, 07:44 ] |
| Post subject: | |
now the question is will those a-10 air 2 air kills be the last gun kills for the airforce. The next question will be when was the last gun kill by the airforce prior to the a-10's taking out the choppers. |
|
| Author: | majormadmax [ 21 Jan 2005, 12:50 ] |
| Post subject: | |
Dice If you can get ahold of the "official" numbers I would be grateful. Let me know and I will send you my work email account, if you prefer to send them there. Cheers! M2 |
|
| Author: | Dice-man [ 21 Jan 2005, 14:43 ] |
| Post subject: | |
M2, the F-111 is credited with destroying 950 tanks <b>and armored vehicles</b> but the info I have doen't break it out to tanks V ACPs. If you add the Hawgs tanks and ACPs from the above list, like the 111 does, you would have well over 1400. I'll dig a little deeper to try to find a number just for tanks if you need it. BTW- my info comes from the Sacramento Air Longistics Center (A-10/F-111 SPO) Historical Study NO. 100 dated September 1992. Ugly But Well Hung |
|
| Author: | eagle20899 [ 21 Jan 2005, 17:00 ] |
| Post subject: | |
major........looks like we have some common ground. I worked Hogs at Norvenich '83-'87. Interesting place and times. Also worked Varks at P'burgh and Lakenheath. Both jets have some unique capabilities. The F model varks with pave-tac could do some serious terrain remodeling. Saw some pave-tac video of tank bombing in '91 from 30k feet. Don't want to be on the end of that. Saw a hog make a lowlevel AB attack where the pilot had to climb to get over the trees surrounding the base. Nads.... |
|
| Author: | sgtgoose1 [ 21 Jan 2005, 17:43 ] |
| Post subject: | |
I DONT THINK YOU'LL EVER GET A "BAD" WORD ABOUT A VARK OR SPARKVARK HERE. IT WAS A GREAT PLANE IN MY BOOK. MONEY TALKS,B.S. JUST PILES UP. |
|
| Author: | Hawg166 [ 21 Jan 2005, 18:12 ] |
| Post subject: | |
Its really to bad the Vark never worked as a Navy jet. Would have had a bad ass strike package with A-6's F-111's and F-14's. That would hav been a real deep interdiction package. By this time tomorrow I shall have gained either a pearage or Westminster Abbey........Nelson |
|
| Author: | Type 7 [ 22 Jan 2005, 02:47 ] |
| Post subject: | |
<BLOCKQUOTE id=quote><font size=1 face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id=quote>quote:<hr height=1 noshade id=quote> now the question is will those a-10 air 2 air kills be the last gun kills for the airforce. The next question will be when was the last gun kill by the airforce prior to the a-10's taking out the choppers. <hr height=1 noshade id=quote></BLOCKQUOTE id=quote></font id=quote><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" size=2 id=quote> You know, if I'm not mistaken, I think the last gun kills by the USAF prior to the A-10s, were the two B-52s that each knocked down a MiG-21 during the Linebacker II Christmas bombings of Hanoi in December 1972........one knocked down by a SSgt, and one by an A1C. What the last fighter air-air gun kill was prior to DS I don't know off the top of my head, but likely an F-4 from earlier than LB II. Edited by - Type 7 on Jan 22 2005 01:47 AM |
|
| Author: | Dice-man [ 22 Jan 2005, 07:02 ] |
| Post subject: | |
<BLOCKQUOTE id=quote><font size=1 face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id=quote>quote:<hr height=1 noshade id=quote> Saw a hog make a lowlevel <b>AB</b> attack where the pilot had to climb to get over the trees surrounding the base. Nads.... <hr height=1 noshade id=quote></BLOCKQUOTE id=quote></font id=quote><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" size=2 id=quote> I would guess this stands for Air Base and not After Burnner? <img src=newicons/tard.gif border=0 align=middle><img src=icon_smile_approve.gif border=0 align=middle> Ugly But Well Hung Edited by - Dice-man on Jan 22 2005 06:03 AM |
|
| Author: | eagle20899 [ 22 Jan 2005, 08:28 ] |
| Post subject: | |
Dice.... Yes, AB stands for airbase. I'm an ex-crew chief. F-4D,F-16A&B, A-10, FB-111A, F-111F. While at Norvenich I was crew dog, expeditor, xtrained to eng and hyd, ABDR team leader, white area tech and second man egress qualified. |
|
| Author: | Growler67 [ 22 Jan 2005, 14:50 ] |
| Post subject: | |
<BLOCKQUOTE id=quote><font size=1 face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id=quote>quote:<hr height=1 noshade id=quote> Its really to bad the Vark never worked as a Navy jet. Would have had a bad ass strike package with A-6's F-111's and F-14's. That would hav been a real deep interdiction package.<hr height=1 noshade id=quote></BLOCKQUOTE id=quote></font id=quote><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" size=2 id=quote> If I recall, it was pitched to both the Air Force and Navy. The Navy was impressed but didn't bite. Weight was the biggest factor that the Navy couldn't get over. A proposal for a lighter variant was then pitched, but by then Grumman had slid their foot and the Tomcat into the door. |
|
| Author: | Hawg166 [ 22 Jan 2005, 17:10 ] |
| Post subject: | |
Actally the Tommy grew out of the F-111 and wasnt a pitch instead of the Vark. The navy atempted what they called a catastrophic weight loss program for the 111 but it was to no avail. The landing gear was also a difficult for the Navy as far as the Vark went. Hey Dice here is a history question for you. When was the last Pheonix missile fired from the F-111 if in fact it ever did fire one ? By this time tomorrow I shall have gained either a pearage or Westminster Abbey........Nelson |
|
| Author: | mattlott [ 22 Jan 2005, 18:06 ] |
| Post subject: | |
did a vark ever attempt carrier qualifications. |
|
| Author: | sgtgoose1 [ 22 Jan 2005, 18:17 ] |
| Post subject: | |
THE VARK ALSO SCARED OLD SADDAM IN THOSE EARLY DAYS IN THE FALL OF 90,WHEN HE THREATENED BIO AND CHEMICAL WEAPONS ,3 F-111'S WERE "HOT COCKED" OVER IN "R-BASE"(CANT SPELL) WITH TATICAL NUKES(?) FOR THAT SHIT HOLE. OLD MAN BUSH SAID HE WOULD RESPOND IF THOSE BIO OR CHEMICAL WEAPONS WERE USED HE WOULD DO THE SAME USING WEAPONS OF MASS DESURCTION ALSO. MONEY TALKS,B.S. JUST PILES UP. |
|
| Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|