<BLOCKQUOTE id=quote><font size=1 face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id=quote>quote:<hr height=1 noshade id=quote>
just doesn't seem fair to me that they are the only ones who can't have their art.
<hr height=1 noshade id=quote></BLOCKQUOTE id=quote></font id=quote><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" size=2 id=quote>
Hogpen, let me start by saying fair, no one ever said the AF was fair. Heck a wise man (call sign Dice) once told me that we in the military are here to defend democracy, not practice it. LOL.
For your first question, I did a little research on the internet and came up with what I feel is a good definition. “Nose art is the painting of a motif or personal icon on an aircraft” (
http://www.iainwilliams.anycities.com/nose%20art.htm). Now I don’t think that’s the Air Forces official viewpoint on nose art but by using this definition I would have to say, Yes ladder door art is classified as nose art.
As for the ACC outlook on ladder door/nose art, I would have to do some research once I get back from leave. I do know that when I arrived at Pope in 2000 they were about to lose the Sharks teeth and had to scramble around to find and submit letters to enable them to keep them. Additionally the only other nose art that I know that is officially sanctioned by ACC is the “Let’s Roll” 9/11 nose art.
I do feel that it’s a shame that the ACC will not allow nose art. It’s been part of the Air Force heritage for some time. I know I’ve seen some pictures of WWI vintage aircraft with nose art (
http://biomicro.sdstate.edu/pederses/NOSEART.html) and I guess it really gained popularity during WW II, Korea, Vietnam and the Gulf Wars. I have to agree with jackb (Oh god did I say that), when he said that it gives an aircraft personality. It also gives the aircrew/maintainers a little pride in ownership. I know people who spent major bucks (out of pocket) to personalize their doors and when they did they took even better care of it, if for no other reason, because it was now “Their” aircraft. With those factors alone, I’d have to say yes we should be allowed to have door art. However, unfortunately the Air Force has to look at things on a larger scale. How can you allow one aircraft to have nose art and not another? Additionally Type 7 brought up and a valid point with the PC issue. With the way people are today, anything you put on an aircraft can (and probably will) be considered offensive by somone.
In closeting let me just say that while I love and appreciate nose art maybe we’re better off with they way the policy currently is. When aircraft deploy to combat operations, they typically receive their “war paint” and when they return home, it’s removed. IMHO, this helps maintain the mystic of nose art and peeks our interest in the subject.
====
You can run but why die tired.
============================