WT Forums

Home | WT Forums | Hogpedia | Warthog blog | Hosted sites
It is currently 07 May 2026, 10:41

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 21 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: new movie
PostPosted: 26 Sep 2007, 22:29 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: 08 Nov 2002, 05:48
Posts: 463
Location: Sunny England
found this floating about youtube

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Sdvh5eFMqg


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 27 Sep 2007, 00:08 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: 06 Sep 2003, 18:01
Posts: 252
Location: Lacey, WA
Very Nice :)

_________________
Image Just give me some ammo, a little water.....and some chips if you got 'em


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 27 Sep 2007, 17:22 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: 07 Dec 2004, 16:08
Posts: 1050
Location: Aurora CO
That has some footage I've never seen before. Like the slow-motion of the gun firing, looks like it had the gas diverter on the muzzle. I was also impressed with the footage of the MER dropping off. I could be wrong, but I don't think it was supposed to work like that. Looked like they were trying to ripple drop, but it went really wrong, unless they were just jettisoning the rack and bombs.

Anyway, great find and thanks for the link.

_________________
Slow is Fast, Fast is Slow
Violence may not be the best option, but it IS an option
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 27 Sep 2007, 17:43 
Offline

Joined: 05 Oct 2002, 14:22
Posts: 5353
Location: Missouri
As I recall MERs were never really cleared for the A-10. I've never seen them except on the protos.

_________________
The only time you have too much fuel is when you're on fire.
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 27 Sep 2007, 20:16 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: 07 Dec 2004, 16:08
Posts: 1050
Location: Aurora CO
I've never seen them even in photo's. They could never be hung on the wing stations because they interfeared with the flaps and alerons. All I'd ever worked were TER's.

I guess this is why. [lol]

_________________
Slow is Fast, Fast is Slow
Violence may not be the best option, but it IS an option
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 28 Sep 2007, 00:55 
Offline
WT Admin
User avatar

Joined: 16 May 2004, 12:44
Posts: 1517
Location: DMAFB, AZ
Career field: Crew Chief
I like this one
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Llof5_mOCig


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 28 Sep 2007, 14:56 
Offline
Warthog VFW
User avatar

Joined: 27 Jan 2002, 14:02
Posts: 6162
Location: IL
Boomer,

If you looked at the TO it did show where the MERs could be loaded which were the I think 5&7 the ones in line with the Fence,

We did have over by WLT (Load Toad Training) MERs ,I think for show mostly.

, it was the LAU-88's THE TER MAV racks which had the Wing Flap problem, Fragging the POD and Flap when the in board MAV fired, but I guess they fixed the problem but we Never carried 6 MAVs only 4.

TER and single loading was a \"Big\" issue in the \"Sandbox\", The Beach and the UK \" used TERS for their MK-82's and CBU-58's but We didn't on our end.

They later stopped using the TERS due to reliability issues and hung each station with whatever the mission called for.

So its one of those \"Flip a Coin things\"

Goose

_________________
\"Live Free Or Die\"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 29 Sep 2007, 16:32 
Offline
WT Game Warden
User avatar

Joined: 27 May 2002, 13:12
Posts: 5068
Location: Hill AFB UT
The A-10 was, and still is as far as I know, cleared to carry and use MSEs on stations 5/7, and I believe 6 also. They weren’t use, much like the LAU-88, because of reliability, drag, and a few more issues.

Here's a short video of mers being tested (4.09meg).....

http://www.warthogpen.com/bs_files/mers.wmv


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 29 Sep 2007, 18:55 
Offline
WT Admin
User avatar

Joined: 16 May 2004, 12:44
Posts: 1517
Location: DMAFB, AZ
Career field: Crew Chief
That is a sick amount of bombs.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 29 Sep 2007, 22:37 
Offline

Joined: 13 Dec 2002, 23:30
Posts: 181
Location: osan
Dice good video.
Thats alot of iron straped under the wing.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 30 Sep 2007, 00:38 
Offline
WT Game Warden
User avatar

Joined: 27 May 2003, 18:48
Posts: 2449
Location: Still fighting the indians in Western Massachusetts
We flew with the LAU-88 and three MAV's on it because we had the Litening II on station 9.

_________________
YGBSM !


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 30 Sep 2007, 15:52 
Offline
WT Game Warden
User avatar

Joined: 27 May 2002, 13:12
Posts: 5068
Location: Hill AFB UT
yep, that is a shit-load of bombs. :shock:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 01 Oct 2007, 00:41 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: 03 Dec 2005, 18:12
Posts: 458
Location: Illinois
Are the so called \"un-used\" stations that were removed in mid 80's still removed?

Or does the old girl fly with all her stations now?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 01 Oct 2007, 03:11 
Offline
WT Game Warden
User avatar

Joined: 27 May 2003, 18:48
Posts: 2449
Location: Still fighting the indians in Western Massachusetts
Thats a good question. I have seen Hawgs with stations removed but we always hd all 11. I would surmise that they were removed for wing station problems ? Dice, whats our very own Warthog Territory Mr. Peabody have to tell us about this ? Hmmm ?

_________________
YGBSM !


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 01 Oct 2007, 04:37 
Offline
WT Game Warden
User avatar

Joined: 27 May 2002, 13:12
Posts: 5068
Location: Hill AFB UT
Hawg166 wrote:
Thats a good question. I have seen Hawgs with stations removed but we always hd all 11. I would surmise that they were removed for wing station problems ? Dice, whats our very own Warthog Territory Mr. Peabody have to tell us about this ? Hmmm ?


ROFL, MR. Peabody!! The only two “unused stations” I know of were 2 & 10. They have always been stations which were not used very much because of their location, too far outboard for heavy loads ( 1,000 pounds or more) and too far inboard for loads like the ECM pod or AIM-9s. They were removed for a time by some units because of the reasons I listed above. They were also removed from the demo jets to give them a “cleaner” look and increase their maneuverability, even if it was slightly.

As far as I know 2 & 10 are used on all A-10 today (rockets and flares mostly) and I’ve even seen pictures of 500 ponders being loaded on these stations in OIF. Let me look around and see if I can find pictures of these stations loaded….


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 01 Oct 2007, 15:03 
Offline
WT Game Warden
User avatar

Joined: 27 May 2002, 13:12
Posts: 5068
Location: Hill AFB UT
Outside of testing I believe this is the only time I’ve seen 2 & 10 loaded with anything besides rockets or flares. I was mistaken this was during Operation Enduring Freedom not OIF. The A-10C will now use 2 & 10 for the targetong pods.

Crap I just noticed the 500 pounders are loaded on stations 1 & 11. Hey I'll leave this one up anyway because you don't see 1 & 11 carrying bombs very often either. I think I have one of 2 & 10 loaded also, let me keep looking.



Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 01 Oct 2007, 17:46 
Offline
WT Admin
User avatar

Joined: 16 May 2004, 12:44
Posts: 1517
Location: DMAFB, AZ
Career field: Crew Chief
Yup, that's OEF, 2002. Operation Anaconda, when the 74th arrived at Bagram.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 01 Oct 2007, 19:05 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: 03 Dec 2005, 18:12
Posts: 458
Location: Illinois
jackb wrote:
Yup, that's OEF, 2002. Operation Anaconda, when the 74th arrived at Bagram.


That's a 75th Bird? Did they just take what could get there or what?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 01 Oct 2007, 23:31 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: 19 May 2003, 16:13
Posts: 804
Location: South GA
Quote:
That's a 75th Bird? Did they just take what could get there or what?


They usually take some of both squadrons, this easies the burden of only one unit deploying and saves money because typically the other squadron has the follow up deployment.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 02 Oct 2007, 00:03 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: 07 Dec 2004, 16:08
Posts: 1050
Location: Aurora CO
Great video Dice, thanks. Yep, at DM in the late 70's we only hung flares and rockets on 2 & 10 as well. We always kept all pylons on, though I really wished they'd have let us pull the No. 6 CL. Your head could bounce around in between those central pylons like a damned pin ball going for the extra game.Image

I never once saw a MER at DM. With them, that is one hell of a lot of bombs. :shock:

BTW: while on YouTube, I also came across these:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jCla0sV5 ... ed&search=

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I44P-scc ... ed&search=

Both are multi part series that are pretty good about Red Flag.

_________________
Slow is Fast, Fast is Slow
Violence may not be the best option, but it IS an option
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 02 Oct 2007, 15:11 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: 03 Dec 2005, 18:12
Posts: 458
Location: Illinois
Lil Hitler wrote:
Quote:
That's a 75th Bird? Did they just take what could get there or what?


They usually take some of both squadrons, this easies the burden of only one unit deploying and saves money because typically the other squadron has the follow up deployment.


As I thought I might have read on here before sometime. Thanks Hitler!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 21 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group