|
<BLOCKQUOTE id=quote><font size=1 face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id=quote>quote:<hr height=1 noshade id=quote>
At the risk of asking a stupid question, if the A-10's primary role is to serve as close in support for the troops on the ground, how come the A-10 program hasn't been transfered to the Army? If the army operates attack helicopters like the Cobra and the Apache that serve a very similar role, why not the Warthog? It seems like it might be easier logistics-wise to coordinate things if the A-10 was an Army aircraft.
-Beans
<hr height=1 noshade id=quote></BLOCKQUOTE id=quote></font id=quote><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" size=2 id=quote>
On another tack, IMO the Army should have the aircraft and have it's own air support capability ala the Marines. IMHO, the Army would treat the A-10 in the same way the AF treats the F/A-22 (anything it wants, anytime) if they possessed these planes. But aside from Key West, the AF would never give up the mission and it's associated $$$, regardless of whether they liked the mission or not. They probably wouldn't want 19 yr old Warrants flying the same planes their officers do.......<img src=icon_smile_big.gif border=0 align=middle>
|