WT Forums

Home | WT Forums | Hogpedia | Warthog blog | Hosted sites
It is currently 07 May 2026, 23:40

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 27 Mar 2005, 03:49 
Offline

Joined: 27 Mar 2005, 03:49
Posts: 2
At the risk of asking a stupid question, if the A-10's primary role is to serve as close in support for the troops on the ground, how come the A-10 program hasn't been transfered to the Army? If the army operates attack helicopters like the Cobra and the Apache that serve a very similar role, why not the Warthog? It seems like it might be easier logistics-wise to coordinate things if the A-10 was an Army aircraft.

-Beans


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 27 Mar 2005, 06:24 
The Key West accords prohibit the army from operating fixed wing aircraft over a certain gross weight. IIRC, it's approx 10,000lbs?



<b>"You got me all wrong Mudd...i don't like anyone.</b><img src=newicons/saevil.gif border=0 align=middle>"
<img src="http://worldaffairsboard.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=862&stc=1" border=0>


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 27 Mar 2005, 06:26 
Offline
WT Game Warden
User avatar

Joined: 27 May 2002, 13:12
Posts: 5068
Location: Hill AFB UT
Without getting into all the politics of this issue the main reason the Army doesn't fly the A-10 (or other large aircraft) is the Key-west agreement which restricts the size of fixed-wing aircraft, by gross weight, they are allowed to operate, the A-10 is WAY over that limit.

There has been talk of re-writing this agreement and limiting the Army by mission type and not gross-weight but, as far as I know it's all been talk up to this point.

<b>Sniper you must have been typing at the same time I was!</b>


Ugly But Well Hung

Edited by - Dice-man on Mar 27 2005 06:39 AM


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 27 Mar 2005, 08:45 
Offline
Hog Driver

Joined: 08 Dec 2002, 10:36
Posts: 593
<BLOCKQUOTE id=quote><font size=1 face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id=quote>quote:<hr height=1 noshade id=quote>
At the risk of asking a stupid question, if the A-10's primary role is to serve as close in support for the troops on the ground, how come the A-10 program hasn't been transfered to the Army? If the army operates attack helicopters like the Cobra and the Apache that serve a very similar role, why not the Warthog? It seems like it might be easier logistics-wise to coordinate things if the A-10 was an Army aircraft.

-Beans
<hr height=1 noshade id=quote></BLOCKQUOTE id=quote></font id=quote><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" size=2 id=quote>

On another tack, IMO the Army should have the aircraft and have it's own air support capability ala the Marines. IMHO, the Army would treat the A-10 in the same way the AF treats the F/A-22 (anything it wants, anytime) if they possessed these planes. But aside from Key West, the AF would never give up the mission and it's associated $$$, regardless of whether they liked the mission or not. They probably wouldn't want 19 yr old Warrants flying the same planes their officers do.......<img src=icon_smile_big.gif border=0 align=middle>


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 27 Mar 2005, 08:54 
Offline

Joined: 23 Oct 2002, 20:45
Posts: 2802
Many Wo's flying Longbows, straight out of the Highschool to flight program. The US ARMY has also trippled its Fixed wing force and has plans for the A2g variant of the Texan2 in the works. Looks like their getting back into the "COIN" buisness.

"RickUSN-

That was intelligent and useful Mudd.

But it certainly is what Ive come to expect.

Mindless babbling with no intent to either enlighten or inform.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 27 Mar 2005, 09:05 
Offline
Hog Driver

Joined: 08 Dec 2002, 10:36
Posts: 593
<BLOCKQUOTE id=quote><font size=1 face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id=quote>quote:<hr height=1 noshade id=quote>
The US ARMY has also trippled its Fixed wing force and has plans for the A2g variant of the Texan2 in the works. Looks like their getting back into the "COIN" buisness.

<hr height=1 noshade id=quote></BLOCKQUOTE id=quote></font id=quote><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" size=2 id=quote>

Texan 2 A-G variant? Now that would be interesting.....and sorta neat.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 27 Mar 2005, 09:14 
Offline

Joined: 23 Oct 2002, 20:45
Posts: 2802
Raytheon developed a kit to optimize the Texan's performance in combat environments, converting them to a T-6B for foreign sales. The B version has a weapons control computer and six wing hard points for mounting bombs, rocket pods, or machine guns. I did a walkaround of it back when we were selecting the JPATS trainer.

"RickUSN-

That was intelligent and useful Mudd.

But it certainly is what Ive come to expect.

Mindless babbling with no intent to either enlighten or inform.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 27 Mar 2005, 09:28 
Offline

Joined: 23 Oct 2002, 20:45
Posts: 2802
<img src="http://www.raytheonaircraft.com/images/government/t_6/t_6_6_800_600.jpg" border=0>

"RickUSN-

That was intelligent and useful Mudd.

But it certainly is what Ive come to expect.

Mindless babbling with no intent to either enlighten or inform.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 32 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group